Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes

Given the difficulties people experience in making trade-offs, what are the consequences of using simple models that avoid trade-offs? We examine choices by such models in environments where "true" preferences are linear and attributes are characterized by binary attributes. A deterministic elimination-by-aspects (DEBA) model is highly effective over a range of conditions. When preferences are quite compensatory, however, a modified equal weighting (EW) model that uses DEBA to resolve ties is more effective. We explore the sensitivity of results to errors in using DEBA, to different distributions of alternatives, and to error in "true" preferences. Under the conditions examined here, the outcomes of these "boundedly rational" models are highly consistent with "rational" models that explicitly confront trade-offs. We emphasize the importance of binary attributes in reaching these conclusions.

[1]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  Why does one-reason decision making work? A case study in ecological rationality , 1999 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Choice and the Structure , 1956 .

[3]  Magnus Persson,et al.  PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): a "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge , 2002 .

[4]  P. Todd,et al.  Escaping the tyranny of choice: when fewer attributes make choice easier , 2007 .

[5]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[6]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[7]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[8]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell? , 1999 .

[9]  A. Bröder.  Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[11]  P. Fishburn.  Nontransitive preferences in decision theory , 1991 .

[12]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Take-the-Best and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When They Work Well in Binary Choice , 2004 .

[13]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Centre de Referència en Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper n o 39 Is confidence in Decisions Related to Feedback ? Evidence – and lack of evidence-from Random Samples of Real-World Behavior , 2004 .

[14]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  "Take-the-best" and other simple strategies: Why and when they work "well" with binary cues , 2006 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[17]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[18]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[19]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[20]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[22]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[24]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy , 2006 .

[25]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[27]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less “more”? , 2005 .

[28]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[29]  Iver Mysterud,et al.  Take the best , 2000 .

[30]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition: Is Confidence in Decisions Related to Feedback? Evidence from Random Samples of Real-World Behavior , 2005 .

[31]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  O. Svenson,et al.  Analysing and aiding decision processes , 1983 .

[33]  U. Hoffrage,et al.  Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison , 2002 .

[34]  A. Bröder.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  B. Newell,et al.  Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone "takes-the-best" , 2003 .

[36]  Nick Chater,et al.  Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior , 2003 .

[37]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[38]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  “Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When they Work “Well” with Binary Cues , 2006 .

[39]  A. Bröder,et al.  Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Juan A. Carrasco,et al.  Cumulative dominance and heuristic performance in binary multi-attribute choice , 2006 .

[41]  James Shanteau,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: What about unfriendly environments? , 2000 .

[42]  W. Thorngate.  Efficient decision heuristics. , 1980 .

[43]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[44]  B. Newell,et al.  Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[46]  Tim Rakow,et al.  Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning? , 2004 .

[47]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[48]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Is Confidence in Decisions Related to Feedback? Evidence-and Lack of Evidence-from Random Samples of Real-World Managerial Behavior? , 2003 .

[49]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[50]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  New tools for decision analysts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.