Optimal sign inverting control for multiple time-delayed systems

In this paper, we present a controversial control concept, Sign Inverting Control (SIC), for systems with multiple time delays. The main motivation for SIC is to provide added robustness capability of a system against delay variations. A nominal control law is formulated for non-delayed case and SIC suggests the sign inversion in these nominal control gains, which is a paradoxical proposition, in order to enlarge the stable operating regions in the domain of the delays. SIC functions with one critical premise that, the union of two control schemes, i.e., nominal and SIC, produces a larger stable region than each of its components does. The selection of an ideal nominal control law for a successful SIC strategy invites some compromising scenarios. Thus an optimization procedure is followed. To achieve this, we propose a systematic procedure starting with an LQR (Linear Quadratic Regulator)-based controller. Then, a 1-D parametric optimization is performed using a scaling factor on the control gain. The proposed optimal SIC procedure is effectively implemented on a single-axis manipulator setup.

[1]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Optimal sign inverting control for time-delayed systems, a concept study with experiments , 2015, Int. J. Control.

[2]  C. Hsu,et al.  Stability Criteria for Second-Order Dynamical Systems With Time Lag , 1966 .

[3]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  A unique methodology for the stability robustness of multiple time delay systems , 2006, Syst. Control. Lett..

[4]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Mapping Based Algorithm for Large-Scale Computation of Quasi-Polynomial Zeros , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Rifat Sipahi,et al.  An exact method for the stability analysis of time-delayed linear time-invariant (LTI) systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Combination of sign inverting and delay scheduling control concepts for multiple-delay dynamics , 2015, Syst. Control. Lett..

[7]  Nejat Olgac,et al.  A test platform for cognitive delays: target tracking problem with multiple time-delayed feedback control , 2014 .

[8]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Stability Robustness Analysis of Multiple Time- Delayed Systems Using “Building Block” Concept , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  J. Hale,et al.  Stability in Linear Delay Equations. , 1985 .

[10]  Elham Almodaresi,et al.  Stability crossing surfaces for linear time-delay systems with three delays , 2009, Int. J. Control.

[11]  Mohammad Naghnaeian,et al.  Stability Crossing Set for Systems With Three Delays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  An improved procedure in detecting the stability robustness of systems with uncertain delay , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  C. Nett,et al.  A new method for computing delay margins for stability of linear delay systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Nejat Olgaç,et al.  Extended Kronecker Summation for Cluster Treatment of LTI Systems with Multiple Delays , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[15]  Jie Chen,et al.  On stability crossing curves for general systems with two delays , 2004 .

[16]  Dimitri Breda,et al.  On characteristic roots and stability charts of delay differential equations , 2012 .

[17]  PooGyeon Park,et al.  A delay-dependent stability criterion for systems with uncertain time-invariant delays , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  Nejat Olgac,et al.  Investigation of Local Stability Transitions in the Spectral Delay Space and Delay Space , 2014 .

[19]  Silviu-Iulian Niculescu,et al.  On delay robustness analysis of a simple control algorithm in high-speed networks , 2002, Autom..