The Operation Was a Success but The Patient Died: Aider Priorities Influence Decision Aid Usefulness

The usefulness of quantitative decision aid is often impaired and its usage impeded by the misaligned priorities of analysts and the middlemen who employ them. Analysts' professional orientation may dispose them to attend to analytic processes more than to deciders' needs and to stick with outdated practices. As a result, their analyses may be technically sound but disregard key knowledge, make unrealistic assumptions, or answer the wrong questions. Middlemen's financial or other conflicts of interest exacerbate such defects. Deciders may have to take more control of analyses (and analysts) and, for example, bypass middlemen.

[1]  R L Keeney,et al.  An analysis of the portfolio of sites to characterize for selecting a nuclear repository. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Martin A. Tolcott,et al.  Impact and Potential of Decision Research on Decision Aiding , 1987 .

[3]  S. Michael Malinconico,et al.  Decisions under Uncertainty. , 1984 .

[4]  R. Clemen,et al.  Soft Computing , 2002 .

[5]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[6]  P. G. Moore Technique vs. judgment in decision making , 1973 .

[7]  Rex V. Brown,et al.  Does a Reactor Need a Safety Backfit? Case Study on Communicating Decision and Risk Analysis Information to Managers , 1988 .

[8]  M G Morgan,et al.  Bad science and good policy analysis. , 1978, Science.

[9]  S. R. Watson,et al.  Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis@@@Strategic and Tactical Decisions , 1989 .

[10]  Donald A. Keefer,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature , 1990 .

[11]  James L. Corner,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature, 1970-1989 , 1991, Oper. Res..

[12]  R L Keeney,et al.  A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Rex V. Brown,et al.  Research and the credibility of estimates , 1969 .

[14]  James L. Corner,et al.  Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990 - 2001 , 2004, Decis. Anal..

[15]  Clive W. J. Granger,et al.  Pitfalls of Analysis , 1981 .

[16]  S. R. Watson,et al.  The presumptions of prescription , 1992 .

[17]  Morgan Mg,et al.  Bad science and good policy analysis. , 1978 .

[18]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  The Value of Decision Analysis at Eastman Kodak Company, 1990-1999 , 2001, Interfaces.

[19]  C. D. Beaumont Pitfalls of Analysis , 1981 .

[20]  Rex V. Brown,et al.  Rational Choice and Judgment: Decision Analysis for the Decider , 2005 .