Leveraging human thinking style for user attribution in digital forensic process

User attribution, the process of identifying a human in a digital medium, is a research area that has receive significant attention in information security research areas, with a little research focus on digital forensics. This study explored the probability of the existence of a digital fingerprint based on human thinking style, which can be used to identify an online user. To achieve this, the study utilized Server-side web data of 43-respondents were collected for 10-months as well as a self-report thinking style measurement instrument. Cluster dichotomies from five thinking styles were extracted. Supervised machine-learning techniques were then applied to distinguish individuals on each dichotomy. The result showed that thinking styles of individuals on different dichotomies could be reliably distinguished on the Internet using a Meta classifier of Logistic model tree with bagging technique. The study further modeled how the observed signature can be adopted for a digital forensic process, using high-level universal modeling language modeling process- specifically, the behavioral state-model and use-case modeling process. In addition to the application of this result in forensics process, this result finds relevance and application in human-centered graphical user interface design for recommender system as well as in e-commerce services. It also finds application in online profiling processes, especially in e-learning systems

[1]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[2]  Lorenzo Fiorina,et al.  Thinking style, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Validating the theory of mental self-government in a non-academic setting☆ , 2005 .

[4]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. , 2006 .

[5]  David C. Yen,et al.  Research issues of Internet-integrated cognitive style , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  M. Kozhevnikov Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  A characterization of online browsing behavior , 2010, WWW '10.

[8]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences , 2001 .

[9]  Hein S. Venter,et al.  Harmonised digital forensic investigation process model , 2012, 2012 Information Security for South Africa.

[10]  Hao Wang,et al.  Thinking Style and Team Competition Game Performance and Enjoyment , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[11]  Shukor Abd Razak,et al.  A psychographic framework for online user identification , 2014, 2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST).

[12]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Styles of Thinking as a Basis of Differentiated Instruction , 2005 .

[13]  R. LaRose,et al.  Understanding Internet Usage , 2001 .

[14]  Tamader Al-Thani,et al.  Investigating the Relationship between Students ’ Thinking Styles , Self-Efficacy for Learning , and Academic Performance at Qatar University , 2014 .

[15]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: Some Implications for Training Design , 1997 .

[16]  Jelmer Kuurstra,et al.  Individual differences in human-computer interaction : a review of empirical studies , 2015 .

[17]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development , 1988 .

[18]  Yinghui Yang,et al.  Web user behavioral profiling for user identification , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Ensemble-based classifiers , 2010, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[20]  Jihad Turki,et al.  Thinking Styles "In Light of Sternberg's Theory" Prevailing Among the Students of Tafila Technical University and Its Relationship with Some Variables , 2012 .

[21]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  The role of learning environments in thinking styles , 2014 .

[22]  Shukor Abd Razak,et al.  A Review of Current Research in Network Forensic Analysis , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics.

[23]  David Mazursky,et al.  The effects of cognitive thinking style and ambient scent on online consumer approach behavior, experience approach behavior, and search motivation , 2011 .

[24]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Towards the understanding of human dynamics , 2008 .

[25]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Are Thinking Styles and Personality Types Related? , 2000 .

[26]  M. Albaili Differences Among Low-, Average-, and High-achieving College Students on Learning and Study Strategies. , 1997 .

[27]  Tak-ming Yu,et al.  Thinking styles and preferred teacher interpersonal behavior among Hong Kong students , 2012 .

[28]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Thinking style impacts on Web search strategies , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Mohd Fauzi Othman,et al.  Comparison of different classification techniques using WEKA for breast cancer , 2007 .

[30]  Chang Zhu,et al.  Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students , 2011 .

[31]  Balaji Padmanabhan,et al.  Toward user patterns for online security: Observation time and online user identification , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Grenville J. Armitage,et al.  A survey of techniques for internet traffic classification using machine learning , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[33]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Assessing Thinking Styles in the Theory of Mental Self-Government: A Hong Kong Validity Study , 1997 .

[34]  C.-I. Lee,et al.  Internet project-based learning environment: the effects of thinking styles on learning transfer , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[36]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[37]  M. Albaili,et al.  Differences in Thinking Styles among Low-; Average-; and High-Achieving College Students , 2007 .

[38]  Shukor Abd Razak,et al.  Individual difference for HCI systems: Examining the probability of thinking style signature in online interaction , 2016, 2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr).

[39]  Rajdeep Niyogi,et al.  A Framework for Network Forensic Analysis , 2010, ICT.

[40]  Ryen W. White,et al.  From devices to people: attribution of search activity in multi-user settings , 2014, WWW.

[41]  Aaron S. Richmond,et al.  A Brief Research Report: Thinking Styles of Online Distance Education Students , 2006 .

[42]  Li‐fang Zhang Thinking Styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance , 2002 .

[43]  Gerard A. Postiglione,et al.  Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status , 2001 .

[44]  Sotiris B. Kotsiantis,et al.  Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques , 2007, Informatica.

[45]  Khamsum Kinley,et al.  Towards modelling web search behaviour : integrating users’ cognitive styles , 2013 .

[46]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  The Predictive Power of Socialization Variables for Thinking Styles among Adults in the Workplace. , 2008 .