Underneath Kyoto: Emerging Subnational Government Initiatives and Incipient Issue-Bundling Opportunities in China and the United States

At present, progress in mitigating global GHG emissions is impeded by political stalemate at the national level in the United States and the People's Republic of China. Through the conceptual lenses of multilevel governance and framing politics, the article analyzes emerging policy initiatives among subnational governments in both countries. Effective subnational emission-mitigating action requires framing climatic-stabilization policies in terms of local co-benefits associated with environmental protection, health promotion, and economic advantage. In an impressive group of US states and cities, and increasingly at the local level in China, public concerns about air pollution, consumption and waste management, traffic congestion, health threats, the ability to attract tourists, and/or diminishing resources are legitimizing policy developments that carry the co-benefit of controlling GHG emissions. A co-benefits framing strategy that links individual and community concerns for morbidity, mortality, stress reduction, and healthy human development for all with GHG-emission limitation/reduction is especially likely to resonate powerfully at the subnational level throughout China and the United States.

[1]  D. Snow,et al.  Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. , 1986 .

[2]  David L. Greene,et al.  Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation , 2003 .

[3]  J. Pinkowski,et al.  Handbook of globalization, governance, and public administration , 2006 .

[4]  Ian Burton,et al.  Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse , 2001 .

[5]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives , 1998 .

[6]  M. Paterson Car culture and global environmental politics , 2000, Review of International Studies.

[7]  Richard Eder,et al.  Living Hand to Mouth , 1999 .

[8]  Dana R. Fisher,et al.  A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy , 2008 .

[9]  Pty Cheung,et al.  The external relations of China’s provinces , 2001 .

[10]  G. Dore,et al.  The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China’s Future , 2004, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[11]  G. Shafir,et al.  People out of place : globalization, human rights, and the citizenship gap , 2004 .

[12]  R. Raufer,et al.  Navigating the Policy Path for Support of Wind Power in China , 2003 .

[13]  D. Lew,et al.  Alternatives to coal and candles: wind power in China , 2000 .

[14]  P. Koehn,et al.  Great-Power Decentralization and the Management of Global/Local Economic Policy and Relations: Lessons in Fluidity from the People's Republic of China , 2003 .

[15]  P. Koehn Sustainable development frontiers and divides: Transnational actors and US/China greenhouse gas emissions , 2004 .

[16]  Han-Fu Chen,et al.  Almost sure convergence of iterative learning control for stochastic systems , 2003, Science in China Series F.

[17]  P. Steinberg Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia , 2001 .

[18]  Barry G. Rabe,et al.  Race to the Top: The Expanding Role of U.S State Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2010 .

[19]  M. Szonyi Review: Miscellaneous: The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform , 2002 .

[20]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  From Structure To Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures , 1988 .

[21]  Jon Barnett,et al.  Security and climate change , 2003 .

[22]  Elizabeth C. Economy The River Runs Black , 2004 .

[23]  M. Betsill,et al.  Cities and climate change , 2002 .

[24]  Joseph G. Levitt,et al.  Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2013 .

[25]  Alexander Wendt Social Theory of International Politics: “Ideas all the way down?”: on the constitution of power and interest , 1999 .

[26]  J. Diamond Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2005 .

[27]  J. Bauer Forging Environmentalism: Justice, Livelihood, and Contested Environments , 2006 .

[28]  K. Day China's Environment and the Challenge of Sustainable Development , 2004 .

[29]  S. Gardiner Ethics and Global Climate Change* , 2004, Ethics.

[30]  P. Koehn Fitting a Vital Linkage Piece into the Multidimensional Emissions-reduction Puzzle: Nongovernmental Pathways to Consumption Changes in the PRC and the USA , 2006 .

[31]  D. Lampton,et al.  The making of Chinese foreign and security policy in the era of reform, 1978-2000 , 2002 .

[32]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Transportation in Developing Countries: An Overview of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies , 2002 .

[33]  D. Jamieson An American Paradox , 2006 .

[34]  Kai N. Lee Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance (review) , 2005, Global Environmental Politics.

[35]  Barry G. Rabe,et al.  Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy , 2004 .

[36]  M. Betsill,et al.  Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program , 2004 .

[37]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .