The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. M. Kolb,et al. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.
[2] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.
[3] S. Ciatto,et al. Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.
[4] A R Padhani,et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.
[5] Constantine Gatsonis,et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.
[6] C. D'Orsi,et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .
[7] Ellen Warner,et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.
[8] P. Skaane. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.
[9] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography? , 2010, European Radiology.
[10] T. Eberlein. Time to Disease Recurrence in Basal-Type Breast Cancers: Effects of Tumor Size and Lymph Node Status , 2010 .
[11] R. Blanks,et al. Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: A review of the literature. , 2006, Clinical radiology.
[12] C. D'Orsi,et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[13] Enzo Galligioni,et al. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.
[14] Laura Cortesi,et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.
[15] J M Lewin,et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.
[16] Stuart S Kaplan,et al. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.
[17] N Houssami,et al. Early detection of breast cancer: Overview of the evidence on computer‐aided detection in mammography screening * , 2009, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.
[18] P. Skaane,et al. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study , 2007, European Radiology.
[19] P. Skaane,et al. Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2005, Acta radiologica.
[20] N Houssami,et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. , 2007, European journal of cancer.
[21] S. Narod,et al. Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[22] W. Buchberger,et al. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.
[23] Boel Heddson,et al. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. , 2007, European journal of radiology.
[24] Mercè Comas,et al. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. , 2009, Radiology.
[25] S. Plevritis,et al. Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[26] P. Taylor,et al. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. , 2005, Radiology.
[27] Harry J de Koning,et al. BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[28] S. Astley,et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] Stefano Ciatto,et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[30] K. Kelly,et al. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts , 2009, European Radiology.
[31] R. Birdwell,et al. Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program , 2010 .
[32] C. Merritt. Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .
[33] M. Yaffe,et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .
[34] D. Vanel. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.
[35] P. Glasziou,et al. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[36] Paul Taylor,et al. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. , 2008, European journal of cancer.
[37] P. Skaane,et al. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.
[38] Sarah Vinnicombe,et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. , 2009, Radiology.
[39] Enzo Galligioni,et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. , 2008, European journal of cancer.
[40] L. Liberman,et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[41] V. McCormack,et al. Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[42] S. Ciatto,et al. Breast cancer screening: emerging role of new imaging techniques as adjuncts to mammography , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.