The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.

The potential to avert breast cancer deaths through screening means that efforts continue to identify methods which may enhance early detection. While the role of most new imaging technologies remains in adjunct screening or in the work-up of mammography-detected abnormalities, some of the new breast imaging tests (such as MRI) have roles in screening groups of women defined by increased cancer risk. This paper highlights the evidence and the current role of new breast imaging technologies in screening, focusing on those that have broader application in population screening, including digital mammography, breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts, and computer-aided detection. It highlights that evidence on new imaging in screening comes mostly from non-randomised studies that have quantified test detection capability as adjunct to mammography, or have compared measures of screening performance for new technologies with that of conventional mammography. Two RCTs have provided high-quality evidence on the equivalence of digital and conventional mammography and on outcomes of screen-reading complemented by CAD. Many of these imaging technologies enhance cancer detection but also increase recall and false positives in screening.

[1]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.

[3]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[6]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[7]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[8]  P. Skaane Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[9]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography? , 2010, European Radiology.

[10]  T. Eberlein Time to Disease Recurrence in Basal-Type Breast Cancers: Effects of Tumor Size and Lymph Node Status , 2010 .

[11]  R. Blanks,et al.  Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: A review of the literature. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[14]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[16]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  N Houssami,et al.  Early detection of breast cancer: Overview of the evidence on computer‐aided detection in mammography screening * , 2009, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[18]  P. Skaane,et al.  Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study , 2007, European Radiology.

[19]  P. Skaane,et al.  Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[20]  N Houssami,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[21]  S. Narod,et al.  Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[23]  Boel Heddson,et al.  Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Mercè Comas,et al.  Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. , 2009, Radiology.

[25]  S. Plevritis,et al.  Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  P. Taylor,et al.  Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. , 2005, Radiology.

[27]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  S. Astley,et al.  Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  K. Kelly,et al.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts , 2009, European Radiology.

[31]  R. Birdwell,et al.  Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program , 2010 .

[32]  C. Merritt Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[33]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[34]  D. Vanel The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[35]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Paul Taylor,et al.  Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[37]  P. Skaane,et al.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.

[38]  Sarah Vinnicombe,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. , 2009, Radiology.

[39]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[40]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[41]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[42]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Breast cancer screening: emerging role of new imaging techniques as adjuncts to mammography , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.