Optimal aerodynamic design of airfoils in unsteady viscous flows

Abstract A continuous adjoint formulation is used to determine optimal airfoil shapes in unsteady viscous flows at Re  = 1 × 10 4 . The Reynolds number is based on the free-stream speed and the chord length of the airfoil. A finite element method based on streamline-upwind Petrov/Galerkin (SUPG) and pressure-stabilized Petrov/Galerkin (PSPG) stabilizations is used to solve both the flow and adjoint equations. The airfoil is parametrized via a Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) curve. Three different objective functions are used to obtain optimal shapes: maximize lift, minimize drag and minimize ratio of drag to lift. The objective functions are formulated on the basis of time-averaged aerodynamic coefficients. The three objective functions result in diverse airfoil geometries. The resulting airfoils are thin, with the largest thickness to chord ratio being only 5.4%. The shapes obtained are further investigated for their aerodynamic performance. Maximization of time-averaged lift leads to an airfoil that produces more than six times more lift compared to the NACA 0012 airfoil. The excess lift is a consequence of the large peak and extended region of high suction on the upper surface and high pressure on the lower surface. Minimization of drag results in an airfoil with a sharp leading edge. The flow remains attached for close to 70% of the chord length. Minimization of the ratio of drag to lift results in an airfoil with a shallow dimple on the upper surface. It leads to a fairly large value of the time-averaged ratio of lift to drag (∼ 17.8). The high value is mostly achieved by a 447% increase in lift and 16% reduction in drag, compared to a NACA 0012 airfoil. Imposition of volume constraint, for the cases studied, is found to result in airfoils that have lower aerodynamic performance.

[1]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Two-dimensional High-Lift Aerodynamic Optimization Using the Continuous Adjoint Method , 2000 .

[2]  F. Guibault,et al.  Optimized Nonuniform Rational B-Spline Geometrical Representation for Aerodynamic Design of Wings , 2001 .

[3]  Sanjay Mittal,et al.  An adjoint method for shape optimization in unsteady viscous flows , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  S. Mittal,et al.  Multi-Point Shape Optimization of Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2009 .

[5]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation , 1996 .

[6]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization Under a Range of Operating Conditions , 2006 .

[7]  Drew Landman,et al.  Experimental Geometry Optimization Techniques for Multi-Element Airfoils , 2000 .

[8]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  An adjoint‐based design methodology for CFD problems , 2004 .

[9]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoils , 1983 .

[10]  Wr Graham,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VORTEX SHEDDING USING LOW-ORDER MODELS. PART I-OPEN-LOOP MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[11]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Aerodynamic inverse optimization with genetic algorithms , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT'96).

[12]  Laurent Cordier,et al.  Control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime by Trust-Region methods and POD Reduced Order Models , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  M. Damodaran,et al.  Inverse Transonic Airfoil Design Using Parallel Simulated Annealing and Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2002 .

[14]  Sharon L. Padula,et al.  Probabilistic approach to free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty , 2002 .

[15]  Gene Hou,et al.  First- and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods , 1996 .

[16]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  Gerald Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design , 1990 .

[18]  Sergey V Shkarayev,et al.  Introduction to the Design of Fixed-Wing Micro Air Vehicles: Including Three Case Studies , 2007 .

[19]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[20]  M. Heinkenschloss,et al.  Shape optimization in steady blood flow: A numerical study of non-Newtonian effects , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Gregory M. Hulbert,et al.  New Methods in Transient Analysis , 1992 .

[22]  O. Pironneau,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN FLUID MECHANICS , 2004 .

[23]  Sanjay Mittal,et al.  Optimal airfoil shapes for low Reynolds number flows , 2009 .

[24]  J. C. Newman,et al.  Computationally efficient, numerically exact design space derivatives via the complex Taylor's series expansion method , 2003 .

[25]  L. Huyse,et al.  Robust airfoil optimization to achieve drag reduction over a range of Mach numbers , 2002 .

[26]  Siva Nadarajah,et al.  Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization for unsteady viscous flows , 2010 .

[27]  Shigeru Sunada,et al.  Airfoil Section Characteristics at a Low Reynolds Number , 1997 .

[28]  Bijan Mohammadi,et al.  Optimization of aerodynamic and acoustic performances of supersonic civil transports , 2004 .

[29]  Olivier Soucy,et al.  SONIC BOOM REDUCTION VIA REMOTE INVERSE ADJOINT APPROACH , 2007 .

[30]  S. Mittal,et al.  Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements , 1992 .

[31]  Peter J. Kunz,et al.  Aerodynamics and design for ultra-low Reynolds number flight , 2003 .

[32]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Technical aspects of microscale flight systems , 1998 .

[33]  T. Mueller,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2003 .

[34]  S. Mittal,et al.  Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the stabilized finite element methods: Space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations , 1992 .

[35]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Multipoint and Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2002 .

[36]  Sergey V Shkarayev,et al.  Effect of camber on the aerodynamics of adaptive-wing micro air vehicles , 2005 .

[37]  Haibo Dong,et al.  A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly wing section in gliding flight , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[38]  Gene Hou,et al.  Shape-sensitivity analysis and design optimization of linear, thermoelastic solids , 1992 .

[39]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect-Ratio, Thin/Flat/Cambered-Plate Wings , 2000 .

[40]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Unsteady Discrete Adjoint Formulation for Two-Dimensional Flow Problems with Deforming Meshes , 2008 .

[41]  S. Ravindran.  Control of flow separation over a forward-facing step by model reduction , 2002 .