Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler

Abstract Assessing personal exposure to air pollution has long proven challenging due to technological limitations posed by the samplers themselves. Historically, wearable aerosol monitors have proven to be expensive, noisy, and burdensome. The objective of this work was to develop a new type of wearable monitor, an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler (UPAS), to overcome many of the technological limitations in personal exposure assessment. The UPAS is a time‐integrated monitor that features a novel micropump that is virtually silent during operation. A suite of onboard environmental sensors integrated with this pump measure and record mass airflow (0.5–3.0 L/min, accurate within 5%), temperature, pressure, relative humidity, light intensity, and acceleration. Rapid development of the UPAS was made possible through recent advances in low‐cost electronics, open‐source programming platforms, and additive manufacturing for rapid prototyping. Interchangeable cyclone inlets provided a close match to the EPA PM2.5 mass criterion (within 5%) for device flows at either 1.0 or 2.0 L/min. Battery life varied from 23 to 45 hours depending on sample flow rate and selected filter media. Laboratory tests of the UPAS prototype demonstrate excellent agreement with equivalent federal reference method samplers for gravimetric analysis of PM2.5 across a broad range of concentrations.

[1]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Impact of time–activity patterns on personal exposure to black carbon , 2011 .

[2]  John Volckens,et al.  Evaluation of the pDR-1200 Real-Time Aerosol Monitor , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[3]  L. Wallace,et al.  Continuous weeklong measurements of personal exposures and indoor concentrations of fine particles for 37 health-impaired North Carolina residents for up to four seasons , 2006 .

[4]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  A closure study of aerosol mass concentration measurements: Comparison of values obtained with filters and by direct measurements of mass distributions , 2003 .

[5]  Constantinos Sioutas,et al.  Performance evaluation of the active-flow personal DataRAM PM2.5 mass monitor (Thermo Anderson pDR-1200) designed for continuous personal exposure measurements , 2004 .

[6]  G. Stemme,et al.  A valveless diffuser/nozzle-based fluid pump , 1993 .

[7]  E. Seto,et al.  Correction: Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Nithya Ramanathan,et al.  A cellphone based system for large-scale monitoring of black carbon , 2011 .

[9]  L. C Kenny,et al.  A DIRECT APPROACH TO THE DESIGN OF CYCLONES FOR AEROSOL-MONITORING APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[10]  L. C. Kenny,et al.  Characterization and modelling of a family of cyclone aerosol preseparators , 1995 .

[11]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[12]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in Elderly Subjects: Relation between Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  Orawon Chailapakul,et al.  Multilayer paper-based device for colorimetric and electrochemical quantification of metals. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  L. C. Kenny,et al.  Development of a Sharp-Cut Cyclone for Ambient Aerosol Monitoring Applications , 2000 .

[15]  K. Bronstein,et al.  A comparative study of human exposures to household air pollution from commonly used cookstoves in Sri Lanka , 2017, Indoor air.

[16]  Torsten Gerlach,et al.  Working principle and performance of the dynamic micropump , 1995 .

[17]  Charles S Henry,et al.  Paper-based analytical devices for environmental analysis. , 2016, The Analyst.

[18]  J. Volckens,et al.  Filter and electrostatic samplers for semivolatile aerosols: physical artifacts. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Paul J. Lioy,et al.  Exposure Science: A View of the Past and Milestones for the Future , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  Yang Wang,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Three Low-Cost Particle Sensors for Particulate Matter Measurement , 2015 .

[21]  J. B. J. Bussmann,et al.  Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[22]  Charles S. Henry,et al.  Rapid Detection of Transition Metals in Welding Fumes Using Paper-Based Analytical Devices , 2014, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[23]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Sundroid: solar radiation awareness with smartphones , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[24]  Amos Ullmann The piezoelectric valve-less pump—performance enhancement analysis , 1998 .

[25]  Qing Yu Meng,et al.  Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2.5 concentrations: Analyses of RIOPA data , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[26]  M. Brauer,et al.  Estimation of ambient and non-ambient components of particulate matter exposure from a personal monitoring panel study , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[27]  Nicholas Good,et al.  The Fort Collins Commuter Study: Impact of route type and transport mode on personal exposure to multiple air pollutants , 2015, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[28]  M St,et al.  National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter: Proposed Decision AGENCY: Environmental Protection , 1996 .