Accessing Tele-Services Using a Hybrid BCI Approach

Brain Computer Interface (BCI) technology has achieved limited success outside of laboratory conditions. This technology is hindered by practical considerations of set up, lack of robustness and low Information Transfer Rate (ITR). There are two interfaces in a BCI system: the brain’s interface with the computer and the computer-environment interface, which provides access to applications for the user. Three user services were implemented: control of the smart home, entertainment and communication. These may be accessed through a graphical user interface controlled by a BCI. The paper contrasts the performance of an SSVEP based system with a hybrid BCI comprising eye gaze and muscle response (measured at the scalp). The hybrid developed utilizes the EPOC for recording electrical potential and an EyeTribe gaze tracker; these can be combined to provide more robust interaction with applications. Average ITR for the eye tracker and hybrid approaches (190-200 bpm) are higher than for our SSVEP approach (approx. 15 bpm), for the same applications. The poor performance of our SSVEP system was due to the temporal duration of the stimulation (7s) and partly because not all participants could achieve an accuracy of greater than 50%. The current challenge is the replacement of the scalp recorded muscle component with a reliable user modifiable EEG measure.

[1]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  Combining BCI with Virtual Reality: Towards New Applications and Improved BCI , 2012 .

[2]  Mincheol Whang,et al.  A brain–computer interface method combined with eye tracking for 3D interaction , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[4]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Toward a hybrid brain–computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Gaye Lightbody,et al.  A user centred approach for developing Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[6]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Brain–computer interface using water-based electrodes , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J. Zygierewicz,et al.  Asynchronous BCI Based on Motor Imagery With Automated Calibration and Neurofeedback Training , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Guest Editorial: Brain/neuronal - Computer game interfaces and interaction , 2013, IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games.

[9]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Visual and Auditory Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Paul McCullagh,et al.  Developing brain computer interfaces with rapid automated interfaces for non experts , 2010 .

[11]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A high-ITR SSVEP-based BCI speller , 2014 .

[12]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction , 2011 .

[13]  B. Allison,et al.  BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  An overview of research on "passive" brain-computer interfaces for implicit human-computer interaction , 2010 .

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) – towards a new communication channel for online control in gaming applications , 2007, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[16]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[17]  Leo Galway,et al.  Investigation into a Mixed Hybrid Using SSVEP and Eye Gaze for Optimising User Interaction within a Virtual Environment , 2013, HCI.

[18]  Gaye Lightbody,et al.  Contrasting levels of accuracy in command interaction sequences for a domestic brain-computer interface using SSVEP , 2010, 2010 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference.

[19]  Gaye Lightbody,et al.  Investigating the use of brain-computer interaction to facilitate creativity , 2012, AH '12.