Accumulation of Dynamic Catch Bonds between TCR and Agonist Peptide-MHC Triggers T Cell Signaling

TCR-pMHC interactions initiate adaptive immune responses, but the mechanism of how such interactions under force induce T cell signaling is unclear. We show that force prolongs lifetimes of single TCR-pMHC bonds for agonists (catch bonds) but shortens those for antagonists (slip bonds). Both magnitude and duration of force are important, as the highest Ca(2+) responses were induced by 10 pN via both pMHC catch bonds whose lifetime peaks at this force and anti-TCR slip bonds whose maximum lifetime occurs at 0 pN. High Ca(2+) levels require early and rapid accumulation of bond lifetimes, whereas short-lived bonds that slow early accumulation of lifetimes correspond to low Ca(2+) responses. Our data support a model in which force on the TCR induces signaling events depending on its magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing, such that agonists form catch bonds that trigger the T cell digitally, whereas antagonists form slip bonds that fail to activate.

[1]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[2]  Mi-Hua Tao,et al.  Cutting Edge: Mechanical Forces Acting on T Cells Immobilized via the TCR Complex Can Trigger TCR Signaling , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  C. Zhu,et al.  Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[4]  K. Garcia,et al.  A functional hot spot for antigen recognition in a superagonist TCR/MHC complex. , 2000, Immunity.

[5]  P. Bongrand,et al.  Measuring Receptor/Ligand Interaction at the Single-Bond Level: Experimental and Interpretative Issues , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  Forcing Switch from Short- to Intermediate- and Long-lived States of the αA Domain Generates LFA-1/ICAM-1 Catch Bonds* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  E. Evans,et al.  Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[8]  S. Henrickson,et al.  T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases , 2004, Nature.

[9]  B. Evavold,et al.  Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. , 2011, Immunity.

[10]  Deborah Leckband,et al.  Memory in receptor–ligand-mediated cell adhesion , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  E. Reinherz,et al.  The αβ T Cell Receptor Is an Anisotropic Mechanosensor* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  J. Hoyland,et al.  Degeneration of intervertebral discs: current understanding of cellular and molecular events, and implications for novel therapies , 2001, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[13]  Evan W. Newell,et al.  TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity , 2010, Nature.

[14]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Insights from in situ analysis of TCR–pMHC recognition: response of an interaction network , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[17]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[18]  A. Jansson Kinetic proofreading and the search for nonself-peptides. , 2011, Self/nonself.

[19]  Raibatak Das,et al.  A Role for Rebinding in Rapid and Reliable T Cell Responses to Antigen , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical regulation of T‐cell functions , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[21]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[22]  R. Vale,et al.  Biophysical Mechanism of T Cell Receptor Triggering in a Reconstituted System , 2012, Nature.

[23]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision , 1988, Nature.

[24]  Paul M. Allen,et al.  Partial T cell signaling: Altered phospho-ζ and lack of zap70 recruitment in APL-induced T cell anergy , 1994, Cell.

[25]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. , 2007, Immunity.

[26]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Systems Model of T Cell Receptor Proximal Signaling Reveals Emergent Ultrasensitivity , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Opposing Effects of PKCθ and WASp on Symmetry Breaking and Relocation of the Immunological Synapse , 2007, Cell.

[28]  J. Shao,et al.  Flexibility of single microvilli on live neutrophils and lymphocytes. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Pieter C Dorrestein,et al.  A monovalent streptavidin with a single femtomolar biotin binding site , 2006, Nature Methods.

[30]  D. Fremont,et al.  High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. , 1998, Immunity.

[31]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Dependence of T Cell Antigen Recognition on T Cell Receptor-Peptide MHC Confinement Time , 2010, Immunity.

[32]  B. Evavold,et al.  High prevalence of low affinity peptide–MHC II tetramer–negative effectors during polyclonal CD4+ T cell responses , 2011, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  Zhengyu Ma,et al.  The receptor deformation model of TCR triggering , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[34]  Etienne Gagnon,et al.  Regulation of T Cell Receptor Activation by Dynamic Membrane Binding of the CD3ɛ Cytoplasmic Tyrosine-Based Motif , 2008, Cell.

[35]  S. Alam,et al.  T-cell receptor binding kinetics in T-cell development and activation , 2001, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[36]  P. Bongrand,et al.  Force Measurements of TCR/pMHC Recognition at T Cell Surface , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Mechanisms contributing to T cell receptor signaling and assembly revealed by the solution structure of an ectodomain fragment of the CD3 epsilon gamma heterodimer. , 2001, Cell.

[38]  S. Jameson,et al.  T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection , 1996, Nature.

[39]  A. Bretscher,et al.  T cell antigen receptor signaling and immunological synapse stability require myosin IIA , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[40]  V. Zarnitsyna,et al.  Measuring Receptor–Ligand Binding Kinetics on Cell Surfaces: From Adhesion Frequency to Thermal Fluctuation Methods , 2008, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[41]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Basic residues in the T-cell receptor ζ cytoplasmic domain mediate membrane association and modulate signaling , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Wilhelm Friedrich,et al.  Lymphocyte microvilli are dynamic, actin-dependent structures that do not require Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) for their morphology , 2004 .

[43]  Jennifer A. McWilliams,et al.  Relating TCR-peptide-MHC affinity to immunogenicity for the design of tumor vaccines. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[44]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[45]  Jia-huai Wang,et al.  The structural basis of αβ T‐lineage immune recognition: TCR docking topologies, mechanotransduction, and co‐receptor function , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[46]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[47]  B. Evavold,et al.  Cutting Edge: Dependence of TCR Antagonism on Src Homology 2 Domain-Containing Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Activity1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[48]  K. Mossman,et al.  Altered TCR Signaling from Geometrically Repatterned Immunological Synapses , 2005, Science.

[49]  Robyn L Stanfield,et al.  How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[50]  K. Garcia,et al.  T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. , 2011, Immunity.

[51]  Wei Chen,et al.  Monitoring receptor-ligand interactions between surfaces by thermal fluctuations. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Simon J Davis,et al.  The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[53]  M. Jackson,et al.  TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. , 1999, Science.

[54]  K. Takase,et al.  [T cell activation]. , 1995, Ryumachi. [Rheumatism].

[55]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  The kinetics of two dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T cell responsiveness , 2010, Nature.

[56]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  2D TCR–pMHC–CD8 kinetics determines T‐cell responses in a self‐antigen‐specific TCR system , 2014, European journal of immunology.

[57]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.