A data envelopment analysis model with interval data and undesirable output for combined cycle power plant performance assessment

Performance evaluation of combined cycle power plants is a complex problem.This complexity is due to undesirable output production and interval data presence.We propose a data envelopment analysis method to handle the return to scale problem.We determine the interval efficiency scores and offer benchmarks for enhancing them. Determining the optimal scale size of a combined cycle power plant is inherently a complex problem often with multiple and conflicting criteria as well as uncertain factors. The complexity of the problem is compounded by the production of undesirable outputs and the presence of natural and managerial disposability. We propose a customized data envelopment analysis (DEA) method for solving the return to scale (RS) problem in the presence of uncertain data and undesirable outputs. A combined cycle power plant is considered a decision making unit (DMU) which consumes fuels to produce electricity and emissions. The uncertainty of the inputs and outputs are modeled with interval data and the emissions are assumed to be undesirable outputs. The proposed DEA method determines the interval efficiency scores of the DMUs and offers a practical benchmark for enhancing the efficiency scores. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method and exhibit the efficacy of the procedure with a six-year study of 17 combined cycle power plants in Iran. The main contributions of this paper are six fold: we (1) model the uncertainties in the input and output data using interval data; (2) consider undesirable outputs; (3) determine the efficiency scores of the DMUs as interval values; (4) develop a group of indices to distinguish between the efficient and inefficient DMUs; (5) determine the most economic scale size for the efficient DMUs; and (6) determine practical benchmarks for the inefficient DMUs.

[1]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations , 2013 .

[3]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[4]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  Measuring efficiency of just in time implementation using a fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach: real case of Iranian dairy industries , 2011, Int. J. Adv. Oper. Manag..

[5]  P. He,et al.  Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach , 2013 .

[6]  Masahiro Inuiguchi,et al.  Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale with Strong Complementary Slackness Conditions in DEA Assessment: Japanese Corporate Effort on Environment Protection , 2012 .

[8]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[9]  Chia-Chi Lee Analysis of overall technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the medium-sized audit firms , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: A nonparametric analysis , 2012 .

[11]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to Scale, Damages to Scale, Marginal Rate of Transformation and Rate of Substitution in DEA Environmental Assessment , 2012 .

[12]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[13]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  Efficiency Analysis and Ranking of DMUs with Fuzzy Data , 2002, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[14]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization) , 2012 .

[16]  Matthias Grossglauser,et al.  Age matters: efficient route discovery in mobile ad hoc networks using encounter ages , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[17]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function , 2012 .

[19]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: Strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms , 2012 .

[20]  Susan X. Li Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis , 1998 .

[21]  R. Balasubramanian,et al.  Optimization of India's power sector strategies using weight-restricted stochastic data envelopment analysis , 2013, Energy Policy.

[22]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: A metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis , 2013 .

[23]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Ke Wang,et al.  A comparative analysis of China’s regional energy and emission performance: Which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs? , 2012 .

[25]  G. Jahanshahloo Data Envelopment Analysis with Imprecise Data , 2011 .

[26]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[28]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. fossil fuel power plants: Radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environmental assessment , 2012 .

[30]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China:A non-radial DEA approach , 2013 .

[31]  Sebastián Lozano Scale and cost efficiency analysis of networks of processes , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[33]  Production Possibility Frontier , 2014 .

[34]  Shiv Prasad Yadav,et al.  A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Patrick E. Phelan,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency of energy use among similar manufacturing industries , 2011 .

[36]  D. Little,et al.  Best practice , 2012, Nature.

[37]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: Performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[38]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[39]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A note on returns to scale in DEA , 1996 .

[40]  G. H. Huang,et al.  A fuzzy-stochastic robust programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty , 2003 .

[41]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  A fuzzy two-stage DEA approach for performance measurement: real case of agility performance in dairy supply chains , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci..

[42]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Environment-adjusted total-factor energy efficiency of Taiwan's service sectors , 2013, Energy Policy.

[43]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  L. Finch A hybrid approach , 1998 .

[45]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Kuangnan Fang,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of power industry in China based on an entropy SBM model , 2013 .

[47]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with application to base realignment and closure (BRAC) , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[49]  Jennifer Prestigiacomo,et al.  A Hybrid Approach , 2018, How High the Sky?.

[50]  Jie Wu,et al.  A complete ranking of DMUs with undesirable outputs using restrictions in DEA models , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[51]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: a review , 2009 .

[52]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  Measuring agility performance in fresh food supply chains: an ordinal two-stage data envelopment analysis , 2012, Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model..

[53]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[54]  S. J. Sadjadi,et al.  A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Je-Liang Liou,et al.  Will economic development enhance the energy use efficiency and CO2 emission control efficiency? , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[57]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A new fuzzy network data envelopment analysis model for measuring the performance of agility in supply chains , 2013, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[58]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment , 2013 .

[59]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: Methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models , 2012 .

[60]  WangYing-Ming,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[61]  Shigemi Kagawa,et al.  Production possibility frontier analysis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil , 2013 .

[62]  Kaveh Khalili-Damghani,et al.  Fuzzy data envelopment analysis for measuring agility performance of supply chains , 2011 .

[63]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Location optimization of solar plants by an integrated hierarchical DEA PCA approach , 2008 .

[64]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  A critique of non-parametric efficiency analysis in energy economics studies , 2013 .

[65]  Jie Wu,et al.  Congestion measurement for regional industries in China: A data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outputs , 2013 .

[66]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  What is the best practice for benchmark regulation of electricity distribution? Comparison of DEA, SFA and StoNED methods , 2013 .

[67]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  Shannon's entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: Method and application , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[68]  Somchai Pathomsiri,et al.  Impact of undesirable outputs on the productivity of US airports , 2008 .

[69]  Kaveh Khalili-Damghani,et al.  A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEA and simulation to measure the efficiency of agility in supply chain: real case of dairy industry , 2011 .

[70]  Aydın Çelen,et al.  The effect of merger and consolidation activities on the efficiency of electricity distribution regions in Turkey , 2013 .

[71]  Melania Salazar-Ordóñez,et al.  Sugar beet for bioethanol production: An approach based on environmental agricultural outputs , 2013 .

[72]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[73]  Sabuj Kumar Mandal,et al.  Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian Cement Industry , 2010 .

[74]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[75]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis , 2013 .

[76]  Shiv Prasad Yadav,et al.  A concept of fuzzy input mix-efficiency in fuzzy DEA and its application in banking sector , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[77]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  General and multiplicative non-parametric corporate performance models with interval ratio data , 2012 .

[78]  Seyed Jafar Sadjadi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: An application for Iranian electricity distribution companies , 2008 .

[79]  Savas Papadopoulos,et al.  Technical efficiency of economic systems of EU-15 countries based on energy consumption , 2013 .

[80]  Gang Yu,et al.  Estimating returns to scale in DEA , 1997 .

[81]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  An interactive robust data envelopment analysis model for determining alternative targets in Iranian electricity distribution companies , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[82]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA-Discriminant Analysis (DA) , 2012 .

[83]  K. Khalili-Damghani,et al.  Sensitivity and stability analysis in two-stage DEA models with fuzzy data , 2013 .