The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms

The technological innovation systems framework (TIS) is widely used to study the emergence and growth of new technological fields and industries. At the same time, it has been criticized for a number of issues and innovation scholars have made suggestions of how to improve the framework. In this viewpoint, we respond to six areas of criticism: (1) TIS context, (2) system delineation, (3) spatial aspects, (4) transitions, (5) politics, and (6) policy recommendations. We point to promising conceptual developments of how to address shortcomings and highlight needs for further research. We also discuss the prospects of the TIS approach for the analysis of socio-technical transitions. The TIS framework, in our view, has the potential to outgrow its original scope - explaining the dynamics and performance of a technological field - and to address many of the issues relevant when studying transitions.

[1]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[2]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  The need to increase the policy relevance of the functional approach to Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) , 2015 .

[3]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Annika Rickne,et al.  New Technology-Based Firms and Industrial Dynamics Evidence from the Technological System of Biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts , 2000 .

[5]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  In Search of Useful Public Policies — Key Lessons and Issues for Policy Makers , 1997 .

[6]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Explaining the diffusion of biogas in India: a new functional approach considering national borders and technology transfer , 2014 .

[7]  M. Lawhon,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[8]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Engaging with changing spatial realities in TIS research , 2015 .

[9]  F. Geels,et al.  Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997) , 2012 .

[10]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[11]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden , 2001 .

[12]  D. Sperling,et al.  Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate , 2014 .

[13]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden , 2011 .

[14]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[15]  Arend Lijphart.  Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[16]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[17]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[18]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[19]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The complexities in system building strategies — The case of personalized cancer medicines in England , 2015 .

[20]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[21]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies , 2015 .

[22]  B. Truffer,et al.  Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany , 2011 .

[23]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  A Framework for Guiding Policy-makers Intervening in Emerging Innovation Systems in ‘Catching-Up’ Countries , 2006 .

[24]  R. Quitzow.  Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany , 2015 .

[25]  N. Bento,et al.  Spatial diffusion and the formation of a technological innovation system in the receiving country: The case of wind energy in Portugal , 2015 .

[26]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[27]  Bo Carlsson.  Technological systems in the bio industries : an international study , 2002 .

[28]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology , 2013 .

[29]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Creating and shaping innovation systems: Formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany , 2011 .

[30]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[31]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[32]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets , 2012 .

[33]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[34]  B. Truffer,et al.  Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy - A framework and a case study on biogas technology , 2016 .

[35]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Opportunities for and limits to Academics as System builders—The case of realizing the potential of gasified biomass in Austria , 2009 .

[36]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech , 2015 .

[37]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic policy: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden , 1994 .

[38]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Context matters: How existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system , 2011 .

[39]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[40]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[41]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[42]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[43]  I. Otto,et al.  Turn down the heat: confronting the new climate normal , 2014 .

[44]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[45]  M. Fromhold-Eisebith,et al.  Trajectories of sustainability transitions in scale-transcending innovation systems: The case of photovoltaics , 2015 .

[46]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[47]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[48]  R. Cowan.  Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[49]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[50]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[51]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Reflections on the Co-evolution of Innovation Theory, Policy and Practice: The Emergence of the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems , 2010 .

[52]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[53]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[54]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[55]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[56]  Kersti Karltorp,et al.  Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system - Challenges for policy intervention , 2013 .

[57]  Kersti Karltorp,et al.  Formation of competences to realize the potential of offshore wind power in the European Union , 2012 .

[58]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field , 2012 .

[59]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[60]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Why space matters in technological innovation systems – the global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology , 2014 .

[61]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[62]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[63]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Prospective analysis of technological innovation systems: Identifying technological and organizational development options for biogas in Switzerland , 2009 .

[64]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[65]  K. Ingold,et al.  Socio-Technical Transitions and Policy Change - Advocacy Coalitions in Swiss Energy Policy , 2016 .

[66]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[67]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  An analysis of remote electric mini-grids in Laos using the Technological Innovation Systems approach , 2015 .

[68]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? , 2011 .