Spot the match – wildlife photo-identification using information theory

BackgroundEffective approaches for the management and conservation of wildlife populations require a sound knowledge of population demographics, and this is often only possible through mark-recapture studies. We applied an automated spot-recognition program (I3S) for matching natural markings of wildlife that is based on a novel information-theoretic approach to incorporate matching uncertainty. Using a photo-identification database of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) as an example case, the information criterion (IC) algorithm we developed resulted in a parsimonious ranking of potential matches of individuals in an image library. Automated matches were compared to manual-matching results to test the performance of the software and algorithm.ResultsValidation of matched and non-matched images provided a threshold IC weight (approximately 0.2) below which match certainty was not assured. Most images tested were assigned correctly; however, scores for the by-eye comparison were lower than expected, possibly due to the low sample size. The effect of increasing horizontal angle of sharks in images reduced matching likelihood considerably. There was a negative linear relationship between the number of matching spot pairs and matching score, but this relationship disappeared when using the IC algorithm.ConclusionThe software and use of easily applied information-theoretic scores of match parsimony provide a reliable and freely available method for individual identification of wildlife, with wide applications and the potential to improve mark-recapture studies without resorting to invasive marking techniques.

[1]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  Cetacean societies : field studies of dolphins and whales , 2001 .

[2]  G. Seber,et al.  Estimating Animal Abundance: Review III , 1999 .

[3]  Zaven Arzoumanian,et al.  An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus , 2005 .

[4]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  An affine invariant curve matching method for photo-identification of marine mammals , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  J. Stevens,et al.  Sharks and Rays of Australia , 1991 .

[6]  Marcella J. Kelly,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED PHOTOGRAPH MATCHING IN STUDIES USING INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFICATION: AN EXAMPLE FROM SERENGETI CHEETAHS , 2001 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[8]  Daniel J. Wilkin,et al.  Query by sketch in DARWIN: digital analysis to recognize whale images on a network , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Babak Nadjar Araabi,et al.  Computer-assisted photo-identié cation of individual marine vertebrates: a multi-species system , 2003 .

[10]  D. Debinski,et al.  Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius , 2004 .

[11]  W. R. Fraser,et al.  Long–term effects of flipper bands on penguins , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. Ogutu,et al.  Application of mark–recapture methods to lions: satisfying assumptions by using covariates to explain heterogeneity , 2006 .

[13]  William A. Watkins,et al.  SPERM WHALES TAGGED WITH TRANSPONDERS AND TRACKED UNDERWATER BY SONAR , 1993 .

[14]  S. Piertney,et al.  Genetic tagging : contemporary molecular ecology , 1999 .

[15]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Inferring population trends for the world's largest fish from mark-recapture estimates of survival. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  R. A. Reijns,et al.  A computer‐aided program for pattern‐matching of natural marks on the spotted raggedtooth shark Carcharias taurus , 2007 .

[17]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Measuring devices on wild animals: what constitutes acceptable practice? , 2006 .

[18]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  Photo-Identification of Humpback and Gray Whales using Affine Moment Invariants , 2003, SCIA.

[19]  Tim D. Smith,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF PHOTOGRAPHIC QUALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DISTINCTIVENESS FOR THE PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION OF HUMPBACK WHALES, MEGAPTERA NOVAEANGLIAE , 2000 .

[20]  P. Palsbøll.  Genetic tagging : Contemporary molecular ecology , 1999 .

[21]  Photo-identification, Site Fidelity, and Movement of Female Gray Seals (Halichoerus grypus) Between Haul-outs in the Baltic Sea , 2005 .

[22]  P. Bateson.  Testing an observer's ability to identify individual animals , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[24]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  Modeling tag loss in New Zealand fur seal pups , 2000 .

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[26]  N. Kohler,et al.  Shark Tagging: A Review Of Conventional Methods and Studies , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[27]  Lex Hiby,et al.  Photo-identification, Site Fidelity, and Movement of Female Gray Seals (Halichoerus grypus) Between Haul-outs in the Baltic Sea , 2005, Ambio.

[28]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Branding can be justified in vital conservation research , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale , 2001, Nature.

[30]  Tim D. Smith,et al.  Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture-recapture estimates of abundance , 2001 .

[31]  Carlos A. Peres,et al.  Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. , 1996 .

[32]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[33]  Mark J. Huiskes,et al.  Towards computer-assisted photo-identification of humpback whales , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[34]  William A Link,et al.  Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference. , 2006, Ecology.

[35]  D. Booth.  SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF CONSPECIFICS AND FOOD ON GROWTH AND ENERGY ALLOCATION OF A DAMSELFISH , 2004 .

[36]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  Population size and structure of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia , 2006 .

[37]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[38]  W. Fagan,et al.  Quantifying the extinction vortex. , 2005, Ecology letters.