How a distractor influences fixations during the exploration of natural scenes

The distractor effect is a well-established means of studying different aspects of fixation pro-gramming during the exploration of visual scenes. In this study, we present a task-irrelevant distractor to participants during the free exploration of natural scenes. We investigate the con-trol and programming of fixations by analyzing fixation durations and locations, and the link between the two. We also propose a simple mixture model evaluated using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm to test the distractor effect on fixation locations, including fixations which did not land on the distractor. The model allows us to quantify the influence of a visual distractor on fixation location relative to scene saliency for all fixations, at distractor onset and during all subsequent exploration. The distractor effect is not just limited to the current fixa-tion, it continues to influence fixations during subsequent exploration. An abrupt change in the stimulus not only increases the duration of the current fixation, it also influences the location of the fixation which occurs immediately afterwards and to some extent, in function of the length of the change, the duration and location of any subsequent fixations. Overall, results from the eye movement analysis and the statistical model suggest that fixation durations and locations are both controlled by direct and indirect mechanisms.

[1]  Eugene McSorley,et al.  The development of the spatial extent of oculomotor inhibition , 2009, Brain Research.

[2]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[3]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  Eugene McSorley,et al.  The Influence of Distractors on Saccade-Target Selection: Saccade Trajectory Effects , 2008 .

[5]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Baddeley,et al.  Do we look at lights? Using mixture modelling to distinguish between low- and high-level factors in natural image viewing , 2009 .

[7]  Olivier Le Meur,et al.  A Time-Dependent Saliency Model Combining Center and Depth Biases for 2D and 3D Viewing Conditions , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[8]  J. Findlay,et al.  Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing , 2003 .

[9]  Sebastian Pannasch,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00207-3 , 2001 .

[10]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  On the control of visual fixation durations in free viewing of complex images , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  E. McSorley,et al.  The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency , 2012, Vision Research.

[13]  Syed Omer Gilani,et al.  Parallel programming of saccades during natural scene viewing: evidence from eye movement positions. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[14]  A. Coutrot,et al.  How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[15]  J. Henderson,et al.  CRISP: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. , 2010, Psychological review.

[16]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[17]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Distractor effect and saccade amplitudes: Further evidence on different modes of processing in free exploration of visual images , 2009 .

[18]  Graham L. Pierce,et al.  Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[20]  Benjamin W Tatler,et al.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[21]  G. Hauske,et al.  Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: an investigation with higher-order statistics. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[22]  J. Henderson,et al.  How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm , 2009 .

[23]  P Reinagel,et al.  Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. , 1999, Network.

[24]  J. Henderson,et al.  Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object–scene consistency , 2008 .

[25]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  A Functional and Statistical Bottom-Up Saliency Model to Reveal the Relative Contributions of Low-Level Visual Guiding Factors , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[26]  Frédo Durand,et al.  A Benchmark of Computational Models of Saliency to Predict Human Fixations , 2012 .

[27]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  Thomas Couronné,et al.  A statistical mixture method to reveal bottom-up and top-down factors guiding the eye-movements , 2010 .

[29]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.