Finite-difference time-domain analysis of hydrogenated amorphous silicon and aluminum surface plasmon waveguides

Abstract. The large majority of surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based devices use noble metals, namely gold or silver, in their manufacturing process. These metals present low resistivity, which leads to low optical losses in the visible and near-infrared spectrum ranges. Gold shows high environmental stability, which is essential for long-term operation, and the lower stability of silver can be overcome through the deposition of an alumina layer, for instance. However, their high cost is a limiting factor if the intended target is large-scale manufacturing. This work considers a cost-effective approach through the selection of aluminum as the plasmonic material and hydrogenated amorphous silicon instead of its crystalline counterpart. This SPR structure relies on Fano resonance to improve its response to refractive index deviations of the surrounding environment. Fano resonance is highly sensitive to slight changes of the medium, hence the reason we incorporated this interference phenomenon in the proposed sensing structure. We report the results obtained when conducting finite-difference time-domain algorithm-based simulations on this metal–dielectric–metal structure when the active metal is aluminum, gold, and silver. Then, we evaluate their sensitivity, detection accuracy, and resolution. The obtained results for our proposed sensing structure show good linearity and similar parameter performance as the ones obtained when using gold or silver as plasmonic materials.

[1]  Ying Dong,et al.  Design of a High-Performance Micro Integrated Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based on Silicon-On-Insulator Rib Waveguide Array , 2015, Sensors.

[2]  Wei Lu,et al.  Tunable and high-sensitivity sensing based on Fano resonance with coupled plasmonic cavities , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Luigi Zeni,et al.  Low Cost Sensors Based on SPR in a Plastic Optical Fiber for Biosensor Implementation , 2011, Sensors.

[4]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[5]  Mohammad Salim,et al.  Enhanced Phase Sensitivity in Plasmonic Refractive Index Sensor Based on Slow Light , 2016, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[6]  S. Hayashi,et al.  Plasmonics: visit the past to know the future , 2012 .

[7]  Günter Gauglitz,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review , 1999 .

[8]  P. Nordlander,et al.  The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. , 2010, Nature materials.

[9]  A. Fantoni,et al.  A model for the refractive index of amorphous silico for FDTD simulation of photonics waveguides , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD).

[10]  Zhaoying Zhou,et al.  Microsystems and Nanotechnology , 2012 .

[11]  Luping P. Shi,et al.  Peculiarities of light scattering by nanoparticles and nanowires near plasmon resonance frequencies in weakly dissipating materials , 2007 .

[12]  Arkady M. Satanin,et al.  Classical analogy of Fano resonances , 2006 .

[13]  Zengbo Wang,et al.  Peculiarities of light scattering by nanoparticles and nanowires near plasmon resonance frequencies in weakly dissipating materials (invited) , 2007 .

[14]  J. Homola,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors: approaching their limits? , 2009, Optics express.

[15]  Alyssa Bellingham,et al.  Passivated aluminum nanohole arrays for label-free biosensing applications. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.