Milieu-based neurorehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at up to 11 years postdischarge.

OBJECTIVE To examine the rate of productivity and competitive activity in participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at a milieu-based day treatment neurorehabilitation program. DESIGN Follow-up data in a cross-sectional design sought from all admissions from May 1986 to May 1998 at 3 months and at year 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11. SETTING Outpatient milieu-based interdisciplinary day treatment program. PATIENTS One hundred twelve participants with TBI, representing 78.9% of TBI patients successfully discharged from the program. INTERVENTIONS Milieu-based interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation (mean length of treatment, 6.2 mo). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Productivity, defined as gainful employment, school, and/or volunteer work, and competitive activity, defined as work for pay or enrollment in school. RESULTS 88.4% of patients were productive up to 11 years after discharge, with 76.8% engaged in competitive activity and with no decline in productivity seen over time from discharge. CONCLUSIONS A large majority of patients suffering from TBI are able to return to work or a productive life situation after milieu-based neurorehabilitation. Level of outcome did not significantly decline over an 11-year follow-up interval.

[1]  D. G. Lamb,et al.  Milieu-Based Neurorehabilitation at the Adult Day Hospital for Neurological Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[2]  L. Tooth,et al.  Prediction of community integration and vocational outcome 2-5 years after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation in Australia. , 1999, Brain injury.

[3]  D. G. Lamb,et al.  Outcome assessment after milieu-oriented rehabilitation: new considerations. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  J. R. Wall,et al.  Community-based training after acquired brain injury: preliminary findings. , 1998, Brain injury.

[5]  R. Evans Postacute neurorehabilitation: roles and responsibilities within a national information system. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  P. Klonoff Individual and group psychotherapy in milieu-oriented neurorehabilitation. , 1997, Applied neuropsychology.

[7]  J. Epstein,et al.  A long-term follow-up study , 1997 .

[8]  D. Krych,et al.  Long-term follow-up of post-acute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a statistical analysis to test for stability and predictability of outcome. , 1997, Brain injury.

[9]  S. Hillier,et al.  Outcomes 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability). , 1997, Brain injury.

[10]  J. Malec,et al.  Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  P. Eames,et al.  Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a long-term follow-up study. , 1996, Brain injury.

[12]  J. Olver,et al.  Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. , 1996, Brain injury.

[13]  J. Olver,et al.  A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. , 1995, Brain injury.

[14]  I. Altman,et al.  Productivity after neuropsychologically oriented milieu rehabilitation , 1994 .

[15]  H. Winn,et al.  Employment following traumatic head injuries. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[16]  P. Minnes,et al.  Stability of functional outcomes following transitional living programme participation: 3-year follow-up. , 1994, Brain injury.

[17]  W. Schalén,et al.  Economic aspects of capacity for work after severe traumatic brain lesions. , 1994, Brain injury.

[18]  T. Kay,et al.  Predicting employment in traumatic brain injury following neuropsychological rehabilitation , 1991 .

[19]  D. R. Brooks,et al.  Rehabilitation in Australia's mineral sands industry. , 1987 .