Remote Source Document Verification in Two National Clinical Trials Networks: A Pilot Study

Objective Barriers to executing large-scale randomized controlled trials include costs, complexity, and regulatory requirements. We hypothesized that source document verification (SDV) via remote electronic monitoring is feasible. Methods Five hospitals from two NIH sponsored networks provided remote electronic access to study monitors. We evaluated pre-visit remote SDV compared to traditional on-site SDV using a randomized convenience sample of all study subjects due for a monitoring visit. The number of data values verified and the time to perform remote and on-site SDV was collected. Results Thirty-two study subjects were randomized to either remote SDV (N=16) or traditional on-site SDV (N=16). Technical capabilities, remote access policies and regulatory requirements varied widely across sites. In the adult network, only 14 of 2965 data values (0.47%) could not be located remotely. In the traditional on-site SDV arm, 3 of 2608 data values (0.12%) required coordinator help. In the pediatric network, all 198 data values in the remote SDV arm and all 183 data values in the on-site SDV arm were located. Although not statistically significant there was a consistent trend for more time consumed per data value (minutes +/- SD): Adult 0.50 +/- 0.17 min vs. 0.39 +/- 0.10 min (two-tailed t-test p=0.11); Pediatric 0.99 +/- 1.07 min vs. 0.56 +/- 0.61 min (p=0.37) and time per case report form: Adult: 4.60 +/- 1.42 min vs. 3.60 +/- 0.96 min (p=0.10); Pediatric: 11.64 +/- 7.54 min vs. 6.07 +/- 3.18 min (p=0.10) using remote SDV. Conclusions Because each site had different policies, requirements, and technologies, a common approach to assimilating monitors into the access management system could not be implemented. Despite substantial technology differences, more than 99% of data values were successfully monitored remotely. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of remote monitoring and the need to develop consistent access policies for remote study monitoring.

[1]  George W Williams.  The other side of clinical trial monitoring; assuring data quality and procedural adherence , 2006, Clinical trials.

[2]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Quality control of validity of data collected in clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Data Management (SGDM). , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[3]  S. Yaffe,et al.  ROUNDTABLE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF DRUGS, BIOLOGICS, AND MEDICAL DEVICES , 2000 .

[4]  Carl F. Pieper,et al.  Quantifying Data Quality for Clinical Trials Using Electronic Data Capture , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  M. Puhan,et al.  Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective – A postal survey , 2009, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[6]  Jon Nicholl,et al.  Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  A. Garrett,et al.  Using Real-time Data to Drive Better Decisions, Faster , 2011 .

[8]  B. Spilker.  Guide to clinical trials , 1991 .

[9]  J. Concato,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials , 2008, Clinical trials.

[12]  Jonathan R Davis,et al.  Assuring Data Quality and Validity in Clinical Trials for Regulatory Decision Making , 1999 .

[13]  Ian Harvey,et al.  A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  J D Horbar,et al.  An assessment of data quality in the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network database. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods , 2008, Clinical trials.

[16]  Anika Ashok,et al.  ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline , 2009 .

[17]  A HarrisPaul,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009 .