Unified approach to the fusion of imperfect data?

For several years, researchers have explored the unification of the theories enabling the fusion of imperfect data and have finally considered two frameworks: the theory random sets and the conditional events algebra. Traditionally, the information is modeled and fused in one of the known theories: bayesian, fuzzy sets, possibilistic, evidential, or rough sets... Previous work has shown what kind of imperfect data these theories can best deal with. So, depending on the quality of the available information (uncertain, vague, imprecise, ...), one particular theory seems to be the preferred choice for fusion. However, in a typical application, the variety of sources provide different kinds of imperfect data. The classical approach is then to model and fuse the incoming data in a single theory being previously chosen. In this paper, we first introduce the various kinds of imperfect data and then the theories that can be used to cope with the imperfection. We also present the existing relationships between them and detail the most important properties for each theory. We finally propose the random sets theory as a possible framework for unification, and thus show how the individual theories can fit in this framework.

[1]  I. R. Goodman,et al.  Mathematics of Data Fusion , 1997 .

[2]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[3]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[4]  Shozo Mori,et al.  Random Sets in Data Fusion Multi-Object State-Estimation as a Foundation of Data Fusion Theory , 1997 .

[5]  Philippe SMETS,et al.  THE TRANSFERABLE BELIEF MODEL AND POSSIBILITY THEORY , 1999 .

[6]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Imperfect Information: Imprecision and Uncertainty , 1996, Uncertainty Management in Information Systems.

[7]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Belief Functions versus Probability Functions , 1988, IPMU.

[8]  Z. Pawlak Rough sets and fuzzy sets , 1985 .

[9]  Henri Prade,et al.  Fuzzy sets and probability: misunderstandings, bridges and gaps , 1993, [Proceedings 1993] Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[11]  V. Kreinovich Random Sets Unify, Explain, and Aid Known Uncertainty Methods in Expert Systems , 1997 .

[12]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[13]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[14]  Thomas Sudkamp,et al.  The semantics of plausibility and possibility , 1992 .

[15]  P. Smets Imperfect information : Imprecision-Uncertainty , 1999 .

[16]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  Random Sets in Information Fusion an Overview , 1997 .

[17]  G. Klir,et al.  PROBABILITY-POSSIBILITY TRANSFORMATIONS: A COMPARISON , 1992 .

[18]  H. Prade,et al.  La fusion d'informations imprécises , 1994 .