Predicting toxicity in marine sediments with numerical sediment quality guidelines

Matching synoptically collected chemical and laboratory bioassay data (n = 1,068) were compiled from analyses of surficial sediment samples collected during 1990 to 1993 to evaluate the predictive ability of sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), specifically, effects range—low (ERL), effects range—median (ERM), threshold effects level (TEL), and probable effects level (PEL) values. Data were acquired from surveys of sediment quality performed in estuaries along the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf of Mexico coasts. Samples were classified as either nontoxic (p > 0.05 relative to controls), marginally toxic (p < 0.05 only), or highly toxic (p < 0.05 and response greater than minimum significant difference relative to controls). This analysis indicated that, when not exceeded, the ERLs and TELs were highly predictive of nontoxicity. The percentages of samples that were highly toxic generally increased with increasing numbers of guidelines (particularly the ERMs and PELs) that were exceeded. Also, the incidence of toxicity increased with increases in concentrations of mixtures of chemicals normalized to (divided by) the SQGs. The ERMs and PELs indicated high predictive ability in samples in which many substances exceeded these concentrations. Suggestions are provided on the uses of these estimates of the predictive ability of sediment guidelines.

[1]  T. Dewitt,et al.  ΣPAH: A Model to predict the toxicity of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures in field‐collected sediments , 1995 .

[2]  E. Long,et al.  Sediment toxicity in Boston Harbor: Magnitude, extent, and relationships with chemical toxicants. Technical memo , 1996 .

[3]  D. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of Solid-Phase and Pore-Water Approaches for Assessing the Quality of Marine and Estuarine Sediments , 1992 .

[4]  E. Long,et al.  Rapid toxicity assessment of sediments from estuarine ecosystems: A new tandem in vitro testing approach , 1998 .

[5]  G. Lauenstein,et al.  Sampling and analytical methods of the National Status and Trends program National Benthic Surveillance and Mussel Watch Projects, 1984-1992 , 1993 .

[6]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Biological effects of toxic contaminants in sediments from Long Island sound and environs. Technical memo , 1994 .

[7]  P. Chapman,et al.  Inter-laboratory comparison of a sediment toxicity test using the marine amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius , 1986 .

[8]  P. Chapman,et al.  Limited bioavailability of sediment pah near an aluminum smelter: Contamination does not equal effects , 1996 .

[9]  E. Long,et al.  Magnitude and extent of sediment toxicity in Tampa Bay, Florida , 1994 .

[10]  M. Schiewe,et al.  Use of a Bacterial Bioluminescence Assay to Assess Toxicity of Contaminated Marine Sediments , 1985 .

[11]  D. Macdonald,et al.  A Preliminary Evaluation of Sediment Quality Assessment Values for Freshwater Ecosystems , 1996 .

[12]  Fred D. Calder,et al.  Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters , 1996, Ecotoxicology.

[13]  A. Robertson,et al.  Estimates of the Spatial Extent of Sediment Toxicity in Major U.S. Estuaries , 1996 .

[14]  Christopher G. Ingersoll,et al.  Calculation and Evaluation of Sediment Effect Concentrations for the Amphipod Hyalella azteca and the Midge Chironomus riparius , 1996 .

[15]  E. Long.  Magnitude and extent of sediment toxicity in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary / Edward R. Long ... [et al.]. , 1995 .

[16]  Fred D. Calder,et al.  Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments , 1995 .

[17]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Sediment quality assessment studies of Tampa bay, Florida , 1996 .

[18]  J. Heltshe,et al.  Revised approach to toxicity test acceptability criteria using a statistical performance assessment , 1997 .