LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) Usability in School Buses and Passenger Vehicles

Objective. The present study was designed to assess LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in both cars and school buses. Despite being designed to make child restraint system (CRS) installation in vehicles easier and with fewer opportunities for misuse, there have been reports that LATCH is not as easy to use, or as effective, as hoped. To date, there have been few systematic or experimental studies evaluating LATCH usability. Further, based on research demonstrating that small children in school buses are not protected from injury in the same manner as larger children, motor vehicle safety regulations now require LATCH anchorages to be installed on a proportion of seats in all school buses, allowing for the installation of CRS. The main objectives of the study were to assess LATCH usability in cars and school buses and to make recommendations to improve its design and labeling. Methods. Forty-eight paid participants (younger vs. older; experienced vs. not experienced) installed CRS in a car and a school bus using three different types of lower anchorage connectors and top tethers. Dependent measures included time to install and remove the CRS, frequency and seriousness of errors, and subjective usability reports. Results. Surprisingly, many participants were not familiar with the LATCH system and believed that CRS should only be installed using the seat belt. Over 40% of participants did not know where the lower anchorage connectors were located in the car. While installation performance using LATCH was generally satisfactory (all CRS were installed correctly between 70 and 92% of the time), LATCH design improvements in terms of the CRS and both vehicles were identified. Conclusions. The study results generated a number of recommended design improvements that would improve LATCH usability in cars and school buses. These include: 1) clearly identifying LATCH anchors in both vehicle types by using clear, conspicuous labels or pictograms; 2) making LATCH anchors in all vehicles more accessible; 3) designing LATCH components for CRS that are easy to use correctly, provide adequate feedback to users, and are difficult to misuse; 4) anticipating, and designing to minimize, incompatibility between CRS and vehicles; 5) using maximum seat spacing in school buses for seats equipped with LATCH anchors; and, most importantly, 6) raising awareness of LATCH in the driving public.

[1]  R Boissoneau,et al.  A national study: the use of specialty surgical teams. , 1997, Journal of hospital marketing.

[2]  Zig Ziglar,et al.  Head Start , 1995 .

[3]  Lawrence E Decina,et al.  Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[4]  W Czernakowski,et al.  Misuse mode and effects analysis--an approach to predict and quantify misuse of child restraint systems. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Lawrence E Decina,et al.  Child restraint system use and misuse in six states. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Joe Armstrong,et al.  The Design of Child Restraint System (CRS) Labels and Warnings Affects Overall CRS Usability , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Michael Muller,et al.  Misuse mode and effects analysis (MMEA) - an approach to predict and quantify misuse of child restraint systems (CRS) , 1991 .

[8]  Thomas Turbell,et al.  ISOFIX : A new concept of installing child restraints in cars , 1993 .

[9]  Lawrence E. Decina,et al.  Child Restraint Use Survey: LATCH Use and Misuse , 2006 .

[10]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[11]  W T Gardner,et al.  Development of the CANFIX Infant and Child Restraint/Vehicle Interface System , 1994 .

[12]  Andrew W. Howard,et al.  A national study of Canadian children's safety in vehicles , 2007 .

[13]  Mary Pat McKay Child restraint use in 2006--use of correct restraint types. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  Y Ian Noy,et al.  Usability issues concerning child restraint system harness design. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  L E Decina,et al.  Child safety seat misuse patterns in four states. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Field use patterns and performance of child restraints secured by lower anchors and tethers for children (LATCH). , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.