1 1 SUBSTRATE STIFFNESS AND COMPOSITION SPECIFICALLY DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION OF INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS

Substrate stiffness, biochemical composition, and matrix topography deeply influence cell behavior, guiding motility, proliferation, and differentiation responses. The aim of this work was to determine the effect that the stiffness and protein composition of the underlying substrate has on the differentiation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and the potential synergy with specific soluble cues. With that purpose, murine iPS-derived embryoid bodies (iPS-EBs) were seeded on fibronectin- or collagen I-coated polyacrylamide (pAA) gels of tunable stiffness (0.6, 14, and 50 kPa) in the presence of basal medium; tissue culture polystyrene plates were employed as control. Specification of iPS cells toward the three germ layers was analyzed, detecting an increase of tissue-specific gene markers in the pAA matrices. Interestingly, soft matrix (0.6 kPa) coated with fibronectin favored differentiation toward cardiac and neural lineages and, in the case of neural differentiation, the effect was potentiated by the addition of specific soluble factors. The generation of mature astrocytes, neural cells, and cardiomyocytes was further proven by immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy. In summary, this work emphasizes the importance of using biomimetic matrices to accomplish a more specific and mature differentiation of stem cells for future therapeutic applications.

[1]  J. García-Verdugo,et al.  Neuregulin-1β induces mature ventricular cardiac differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells contributing to cardiac tissue repair. , 2015, Stem cells and development.

[2]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation , 2014, Nature materials.

[3]  Laurie B. Hazeltine,et al.  Temporal impact of substrate mechanics on differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  A. Panitch,et al.  Matrix Stiffness Affects Endocytic Uptake of MK2-Inhibitor Peptides , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  I. Dulińska-Molak,et al.  The combined influence of substrate elasticity and surface-grafted molecules on the ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[6]  P. Kumta,et al.  Early differentiation patterning of mouse embryonic stem cells in response to variations in alginate substrate stiffness , 2013, Journal of biological engineering.

[7]  Dan L. Sackett,et al.  Fabrication of Hydrogels with Steep Stiffness Gradients for Studying Cell Mechanical Response , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Albert J. Keung,et al.  Soft microenvironments promote the early neurogenic differentiation but not self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[9]  E. Maltepe,et al.  Effect of Substrate Stiffness on Early Mouse Embryo Development , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[11]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  The influence of scaffold elasticity on germ layer specification of human embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  G. Prestwich,et al.  Regulation of hepatic stem/progenitor phenotype by microenvironment stiffness in hydrogel models of the human liver stem cell niche. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[13]  Nicola Elvassore,et al.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.

[14]  D. Mooney,et al.  Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  S. Gerecht,et al.  Reconstructing the differentiation niche of embryonic stem cells using biomaterials. , 2011, Macromolecular bioscience.

[16]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Stiffness Gradients Mimicking In Vivo Tissue Variation Regulate Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Andre Terzic,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: developmental biology to regenerative medicine , 2010, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[18]  P. Serup,et al.  Retinoic Acid Synthesis Promotes Development of Neural Progenitors from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells by Suppressing Endogenous, Wnt‐Dependent Nodal Signaling , 2010, Stem cells.

[19]  D. Spray,et al.  Chemical induction of cardiac differentiation in p19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells. , 2010, Stem cells and development.

[20]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  T. Young,et al.  Interactive effects of mechanical stretching and extracellular matrix proteins on initiating osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2009, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[22]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening , 2009, Current Biology.

[23]  Matthias P Lutolf,et al.  Artificial Stem Cell Niches , 2009, Advanced materials.

[24]  Olle Inganäs,et al.  The promotion of neuronal maturation on soft substrates. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[25]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  ECM Compliance Regulates Osteogenesis by Influencing MAPK Signaling Downstream of RhoA and ROCK , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[27]  M. Mattson,et al.  Cell-extracellular matrix interactions regulate neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells , 2008, BMC Developmental Biology.

[28]  Gordon Keller,et al.  Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Clinically Relevant Populations: Lessons from Embryonic Development , 2008, Cell.

[29]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[30]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[31]  L. Flanagan,et al.  Regulation of human neural precursor cells by laminin and integrins , 2006, Journal of neuroscience research.

[32]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  The effect of matrix composition of 3D constructs on embryonic stem cell differentiation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[34]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[35]  D. Steindler,et al.  Extracellular matrix effects on neurosphere cell motility , 2003, Experimental Neurology.

[36]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Stem Cells A New Lease on Life , 2000, Cell.

[38]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. Harland,et al.  Fibroblast growth factor is a direct neural inducer, which combined with noggin generates anterior-posterior neural pattern. , 1995, Development.

[40]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  Engineering the Regenerative Microenvironment with Biomaterials , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[41]  Fei Wang,et al.  Material Properties of the Cell Dictate Stress-induced Spreading and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells Growing Evidence Suggests That Physical Microenvironments and Mechanical Stresses, in Addition to Soluble Factors, Help Direct Mesenchymal-stem-cell Fate. However, Biological Responses to a L , 2022 .

[42]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[43]  L. E. Malvern.  Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .