Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy can miss 20–30% of clinically significant cancers. We evaluate an alternative approach—transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. From January 2005 through September 2008, 373 consecutive men underwent TTMB (294 men with ⩾1 prior negative biopsy and 79 men as the initial biopsy). The location of each positive biopsy core, number of positive cores, and percent involvement of each core was recorded. Cancer detection rate for the initial biopsy was 75.9%. For men with 1, 2, and ⩾3 prior negative biopsies detection rates were 55.5%, 41.7%, and 34.4%, respectively. In all, 55.5% of the cancers identified were Gleason ⩾7. The majority of the cancers were multifocal. There was no significant change in the number of positive cores or Gleason score as the number of prior biopsies increased. The anterior and apical aspects of the prostate were among the most common cancer locations. TTMB provides a high rate of cancer detection as initial and repeat biopsy. TTMB was particularly effective at diagnosing anterior and apical cancer. TTMB may have particular application for men considering active surveillance, with prior negative TRUS biopsies, and those considering subtotal gland or other minimally invasive treatments.

[1]  B. Moran,et al.  Stereotactic transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2009, Urology.

[2]  A. Haese*,et al.  High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. , 2006, European urology.

[3]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Predictors of prostate cancer after initial negative systematic 12 core biopsy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[4]  C. Magi-Galluzzi,et al.  Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[5]  R. Shackman,et al.  BIOPSY , 1961 .

[6]  Takashi Arakawa,et al.  Cancer core distribution in patients diagnosed by extended transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2005, Urology.

[7]  J. Moul,et al.  Significant discrepancies between diagnostic and pathologic Gleason sums in prostate cancer: the predictive role of age and prostate-specific antigen. , 2008, Urology.

[8]  J. Jones Saturation biopsy for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[9]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[10]  W. Catalona,et al.  Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Prostate cancer distribution in patients diagnosed by transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy. , 2007, European urology.

[12]  Susanne Hempel,et al.  Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Clare Allen,et al.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? , 2006, European urology.

[14]  W. Fair,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[15]  F. Aragona,et al.  Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. , 2007, Urology.

[16]  W. Ellis,et al.  Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[17]  V. Pansadoro,et al.  The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[18]  T. Koyanagi,et al.  Difference of cancer core distribution between first and repeat biopsy: In patients diagnosed by extensive transperineal ultrasound guided template prostate biopsy , 2004, The Prostate.

[19]  D. Johnston,et al.  Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci , 2000, Cancer.

[20]  A. Weaver,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[21]  Evis Sala,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  J. Jones,et al.  Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[23]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Proximity of prostate cancer to the urethra: implications for minimally invasive ablative therapies. , 2000, Urology.

[24]  K. Wallner,et al.  The morbidity of transperineal template‐guided prostate mapping biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[25]  Stefano Cavalleri,et al.  Prostate Biopsy: The Transperineal Approach , 2007 .

[26]  Amit Patel,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[27]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[28]  C C Schulman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[29]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. , 2009, Radiology.

[30]  Amit Patel,et al.  Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.