Validation of tie corroboration and reported alter characteristics among a sample of young men who have sex with men

The differences between direct ties (i.e., ties between a respondent and their nominees) and ties between nominees (indirect) are key to understanding network structure, yet remain understudied. Within a sample of 175 young men who have sex with men, we explored the corroboration of sex and drug ties, and factors associated with corroboration. The majority of instances in which there was no corroboration for either sex or drug ties was due to one individual not appearing in another respondent's network. When an individual did appear in another respondent's network, direct sex and drug ties were corroborated in most cases. We also found that more indirect sex ties were corroborated than direct sex ties (95.7% vs. 88.9%), but the reverse was true for indirect versus direct drug ties (73.1% vs. 84.1%). Strength of relationship and frequency of communication were both associated with confirmed direct ties, but not with indirect ties. Based on these findings, we recommend that direct and indirect ties be treated differently in network analyses.

[1]  Michelle Birkett,et al.  The Sexual Networks of Racially Diverse Young Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2015, Archives of sexual behavior.

[2]  J. Bailey,et al.  How Accurate Is the Family History Method for Assessing Siblings' Sexual Orientation? , 1999, Archives of sexual behavior.

[3]  L M Kuhns,et al.  Methods for Collection of Participant-aided Sociograms for the Study of Social, Sexual and Substance-using Networks Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. , 2015, Connections.

[4]  Michael W. Spiller,et al.  HIV Infection and HIV-Associated Behaviors Among Persons Who Inject Drugs — 20 Cities, United States, 2012 , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[5]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[6]  A. Lansky,et al.  Binge drinking and risky sexual behavior among HIV-negative and unknown HIV status men who have sex with men, 20 US cities. , 2015, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[7]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Systematic Biases in Social Perception , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Michelle Birkett,et al.  The Role of Geographic and Network Factors in Racial Disparities in HIV Among Young Men Who have Sex with Men: An Egocentric Network Study , 2015, AIDS and Behavior.

[9]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Evaluating the Paper-to-Screen Translation of Participant-Aided Sociograms with High-Risk Participants , 2016, CHI.

[10]  G. Ryan,et al.  Measuring Agreement between Egos and Alters , 2014 .

[11]  P. Halkitis,et al.  Social Support Network Characteristics and Sexual Risk Taking Among a Racially/Ethnically Diverse Sample of Young, Urban Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2013, AIDS and Behavior.

[12]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Network inference, error, and informant (in)accuracy: a Bayesian approach , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[13]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Men Who Have Sex With Men Have a 140-Fold Higher Risk for Newly Diagnosed HIV and Syphilis Compared With Heterosexual Men in New York City , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[14]  K. Bucholz,et al.  The interpretability of family history reports of alcoholism in general community samples: findings in a midwestern U.S. twin birth cohort. , 2012, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[15]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data , 1976 .

[16]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[17]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[18]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[19]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms , 2007 .

[20]  Ali Haider,et al.  Partner naming and forgetting: Recall of network members , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[21]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Who knows your HIV status? What HIV + patients and their network members know about each other , 1995 .

[22]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[23]  D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting as a cause of incomplete reporting of sexual and drug injection partners. , 1999, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[24]  J. Tucker,et al.  Social network and individual correlates of sexual risk behavior among homeless young men who have sex with men. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[25]  K. Holmes,et al.  A Comparison of Sexual Behavior Patterns Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Heterosexual Men and Women , 2012, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[26]  Joseph Cox,et al.  The importance of social networks in their association to drug equipment sharing among injection drug users: a review. , 2007, Addiction.

[27]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Structural Bridging Network Position is Associated with HIV Status in a Younger Black Men Who Have Sex with Men Epidemic , 2014, AIDS and Behavior.

[28]  jimi adams,et al.  To tell the truth: Measuring concordance in multiply reported network data , 2007, Soc. Networks.