Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias.

OBJECTIVE To assess the presence of publication bias and its relation to geographical bias in clinical trials involving complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) published in the highest impact factor general medicine journals. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING All CAM clinical trials published in the four highest impact factor general medicine journals, Lancet and British Medical Journal (European), and New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of American Medical Association (U.S.), between 1965 and 2004 were abstracted using Medline. Three reviewers abstracted data from the individual studies. In a multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a positive study were assessed. RESULTS A total of 259 studies met the inclusion criteria. CAM trials published in the European journals were significantly more likely to be positive compared to those published in the U.S. journals (76% vs. 50%, odds ratio [OR]=3.15, P<0.0001). Studies originating outside of the United States were significantly more likely to be positive compared to the U.S. studies (75% vs. 49%, P<0.0001). Adjusting for location and other variables in a multivariate model, the OR for European vs. U.S. journals to publish a positive CAM trial was 1.95 (P=0.11). CONCLUSION Publication bias related to CAM trials among the highest impact factor general medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias.

[1]  A. Bardia,et al.  Search Strategies for Retrieving Complementary and Alternative Medicine Clinical Trials in Oncology , 2006, Integrative cancer therapies.

[2]  E. Ernst,et al.  Alternative therapy bias , 1997, Nature.

[3]  A. Vickers,et al.  Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[4]  Eric Lejeune,et al.  Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[5]  E. Ernst,et al.  Bias in alternative medicine is still rife but is diminishing , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Klaus Linde,et al.  Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[7]  J. Neuhaus,et al.  Saw palmetto for benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  E Ernst,et al.  A profile of journals of complementary and alternative medicine. , 2001, Swiss medical weekly.

[9]  Rudolf Bauer,et al.  An evaluation of Echinacea angustifolia in experimental rhinovirus infections. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies. , 2000 .

[11]  Fish Oil Supplementation and Risk of Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients With Implantable Defibrillators: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005 .

[12]  A. Szegedi,et al.  Acute treatment of moderate to severe depression with hypericum extract WS 5570 (St John's wort): randomised controlled double blind non-inferiority trial versus paroxetine , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.