Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance

This study explores and tests a new model that links different types of technology usage to individual-level outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to examine the effects of efficient use (routinization) and effective use (infusion) along with the traditional measure of usage—namely, frequency of use—on two dimensions of individual-level outcomes: information technology-enabled administrative performance and information technology-enabled salesperson performance. To maintain consistency with the existing literature, the authors examine the effects of predeployment attitude toward or acceptance of technology and pre-deployment intended use of technology. The authors discuss managerial implications and provide directions for future research.

[1]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[2]  R. Oliver,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Consequences of Behavior-and Outcome-Based Sales Control Systems , 1994 .

[3]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Sales Force Automation and Sales Performance: Do Experience and Expertise Matter? , 2004 .

[4]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[5]  Robert M. Barker,et al.  Salesforce automation, perceived information accuracy and user satisfaction , 2005 .

[6]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[7]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[8]  Tony Carter,et al.  Technology and the Sales Force , 2002 .

[9]  Michael Ahearne,et al.  Effect of Technology on Sales Performance: Progressing from Technology Acceptance to Technology Usage and Consequence , 2004 .

[10]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Impact of sales force automation on technology-related stress, effort, and technology usage among salespeople , 2005 .

[11]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[12]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[13]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[14]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[15]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Factors Leading to Sales Force Automation Use: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[19]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring technology incorporation/infusion , 1992 .

[20]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[21]  William D. Perreault,et al.  A Role Stress Model of the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salespersons , 1984 .

[22]  James C. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Sampling Error and Model Characteristics on Parameter Estimation for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[24]  A. Barker,et al.  Benchmarks of Successful Salesforce Performance , 2009 .

[25]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  George J. Avlonitis,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force , 2005 .

[29]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[30]  Adam Rapp,et al.  Moving Beyond the Direct Effect of SFA Adoption on Salesperson Performance: Training and Support as Key Moderating Factors , 2005 .

[31]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[32]  Earl D. Honeycutt,et al.  Impediments to sales force automation , 2005 .

[33]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Critical issues in information systems research , 1987 .

[34]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[35]  R. Erffmeyer,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Sales Force Automation Practices: Expectations and Realities , 2001 .

[36]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  C. Fornell,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden , 1994 .

[38]  C. Speier,et al.  The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies , 2002 .

[39]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage , 1984 .

[40]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .