Gas exchange and stand-level estimates of water use and gross primary productivity in an experimental pine and switchgrass intercrop forestry system on the Lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina, U.S.A

Abstract Despite growing interest in using switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) as a biofuel, there are limited data on the physiology of this species and its effect on stand water use and carbon (C) assimilation when grown as a forest intercrop for bioenergy. Therefore, we quantified gas exchange rates of switchgrass within intercropped plots and in pure switchgrass plots during its second growing season in an intensively managed loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) plantation in North Carolina. Switchgrass physiology was characterized over the growing season from June to October 2010 in terms of photosynthesis (μmol m −2  s −1 ), stomatal conductance (mmol m −2  s −1 ), and assimilation responses to photosynthetic photon flux density and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (CO 2 ). We then used a process-based model of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum to scale leaf-level gas exchange data to provide estimates of pine and switchgrass stand-level water use (mm) and carbon exchange (g C m −2 ) over a three-year period. Peak switchgrass photosynthesis (32.7 ± 0.9 μmol m −2  s −1 ) and stomatal conductance (252 ± 12 mmol m −2  s −1 ) rates were measured in July, with minimum values (18.7 ± 1.4 μmol m −2  s −1 and 104 ± 6 mmol m −2  s −1 , respectively) recorded at the end of the growing season (October). Switchgrass gas exchange and parameter estimates from the light- and CO 2 response curves did not vary between treatments. However, gas exchange values differed significantly between measurement dates. Model predictions of stand-level transpiration ranged from 287 to 431 mm year −1 for pine and from 245 to 296 mm year −1 for switchgrass. Annual C exchange for loblolly pine ranged from 1165 to 1903 g m −2 compared to 1386 to 1594 g m −2 for switchgrass. At this stage of stand development, no effect of intercropping was evident and there was no effect of distance from the nearest pine row on any switchgrass gas exchange variable measured. However, we anticipate that as this intercropped system develops over time, competition for resources such as light, water or nitrogen may change, with the potential to impact switchgrass physiology and biomass production.

[1]  J. Domec,et al.  Evaluation of intercropped switchgrass establishment under a range of experimental site preparation treatments in a forested setting on the Lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina, U.S.A. , 2012 .

[2]  Patrick Meir,et al.  Evidence from Amazonian forests is consistent with isohydric control of leaf water potential. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[3]  M. Coleman,et al.  Fertilization but not irrigation influences hydraulic traits in plantation-grown loblolly pine , 2008 .

[4]  A. Tuzet,et al.  The effect of temperature on C(4)-type leaf photosynthesis parameters. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[5]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Nitrogen mineralization dynamics following the establishment of a loblolly pine plantation , 2003 .

[6]  Hideaki Usuda,et al.  Variations in the Photosynthesis Rate and Activity of Photosynthetic Enzymes in Maize Leaf Tissue of Different Ages , 1984 .

[7]  R. Monson,et al.  The quantum yield for CO2 uptake in C3 and C4 grasses , 1982, Photosynthesis Research.

[8]  J. Brejda.  Fertilization of Native Warm‐Season Grasses , 2015 .

[9]  James P. Kimmins,et al.  Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Forest Management and Environmental Ethics in Forestry , 1987 .

[10]  D. D. Wolf,et al.  Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop , 1996 .

[11]  S. Roberts,et al.  Harvest residue and competing vegetation affect soil moisture, soil temperature, N availability, and Douglas-fir seedling growth , 2005 .

[12]  J. Thornley.  Modelling Water in Crops and Plant Ecosystems , 1996 .

[13]  F. Dohleman,et al.  Does greater leaf-level photosynthesis explain the larger solar energy conversion efficiency of Miscanthus relative to switchgrass? , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[14]  Ge Sun,et al.  Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[15]  J. Seiler,et al.  Short-term impacts of nutrient manipulations on leaf gas exchange and biomass partitioning in contrasting 2-year-old Pinus taeda clones during seedling establishment , 2009 .

[16]  William R Ocumpaugh,et al.  Developing Switchgrass as a Bioenergy Crop , 1998 .

[17]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[18]  C. Beauvais.  Coarse Woody Debris in a Loblolly Pine Plantation Managed for Biofuel Production , 2010 .

[19]  P. J. Smethurst,et al.  Distribution of carbon and nutrients and fluxes of mineral nitrogen after clear-felling a Pinus radiata plantation , 1990 .

[20]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: I. Influence of Nitrogen Nutrition, Phosphorus Nutrition, Photon Flux Density, and Ambient Partial Pressure of CO(2) during Ontogeny. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[21]  Lynn E. Sollenberger,et al.  Warm-season (C4) grasses , 2004 .

[22]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  A comparison of canopy evapotranspiration for maize and two perennial grasses identified as potential bioenergy crops , 2010 .

[23]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  THE GLOBAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF ROOTS , 2002 .

[24]  D. M. Gates,et al.  Effects of Nitrate Application on Amaranthus powellii Wats. : III. Optimal Allocation of Leaf Nitrogen for Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[25]  J. Domec,et al.  Interpreting the variations in xylem sap flux density within the trunk of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): application of a model for calculating water flows at tree and stand levels , 1998 .

[26]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE , 2012 .

[27]  R. W. Downes.  Differences in transpiration rates between tropical and temperate grasses under controlled conditions , 1969, Planta.

[28]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Seasonal variation in net carbon exchange and evapotranspiration in a Brazilian rain forest: a modelling analysis , 1998 .

[29]  R. Lemus.  Switchgrass as an Energy Crop: Fertilization, Cultivar, and Cutting Management , 2004 .

[30]  Jules Janick,et al.  Biomass yield stability of switchgrass cultivars. , 2002 .

[31]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate , 1997, Oecologia.

[32]  Robin L. Graham,et al.  Intra-annual changes in biomass, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics at 4-year old switchgrass field trials in west Tennessee, USA , 2010 .

[33]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Photosynthetic Rates and Ploidy Levels among Populations of Switchgrass , 1996 .

[34]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants: Dependence on Temperature, CO2, and O2 Concentration , 1977 .

[35]  B. Ripley,et al.  Differences in drought sensitivities and photosynthetic limitations between co-occurring C3 and C4 (NADP-ME) Panicoid grasses. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[36]  V. Kakani,et al.  Growing season variability in evapotranspiration, ecosystem water use efficiency, and energy partitioning in switchgrass , 2014 .

[37]  L. Wright.  Production technology status of woody and herbaceous crops , 1994 .

[38]  C. Maier,et al.  Respiratory carbon use and carbon storage in mid‐rotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations: the effect of site resources on the stand carbon balance , 2004 .

[39]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  Physiology of Woody Plants , 1983 .

[40]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[41]  J. Norman,et al.  Leaf gas exchange of Andropogon gerardii Vitman, Panicum virgatum L., and Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash in a tallgrass prairie , 1992 .

[42]  B. Marshall,et al.  A Model for C3 Leaves Describing the Dependence of Net Photosynthesis on Irradiance , 1980 .

[43]  C. Tamm.  Determination of Nutrient Requirements of Forest Stands , 1964 .

[44]  R. Sage,et al.  The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants : III. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Activity of Carboxylating Enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). , 1987, Plant physiology.

[45]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus-Acer stand at Harvard Forest : the regulation of stomatal conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties , 1996 .

[46]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[47]  K. Boote,et al.  Physiology and Developmental Morphology , 2016 .

[48]  K. Johnsen,et al.  Branch growth and gas exchange in 13-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) trees in response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration and fertilization. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[49]  P. Adler,et al.  Carbon dioxide and water fluxes from switchgrass managed for bioenergy production , 2010 .

[50]  L. Hutley,et al.  Is productivity of mesic savannas light limited or water limited? Results of a simulation study , 2011 .

[51]  G. Bouyoucos.  Hydrometer Method Improved for Making Particle Size Analyses of Soils1 , 1962 .

[52]  D. D. Wolf,et al.  Nutrient Uptake by ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass Used as an Energy Crop , 2009, BioEnergy Research.

[53]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Switchgrass growth and development: Water, nitrogen, and plant density effects , 2000 .

[54]  R. Oren,et al.  Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. , 2002, Plant, cell & environment.

[55]  Paul W. Barnes,et al.  Distribution, production, and diversity of C3- and C4-dominated communities in a mixed prairie , 1983 .

[56]  A. Friend,et al.  Suitability of process-based tree growth models for addressing tree response to climate change. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[57]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. , 2005 .

[58]  G. Edwards,et al.  Oxygen Inhibition of Photosynthesis: II. Kinetic Characteristics as Affected by Temperature. , 1977, Plant physiology.

[59]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Short- and long-term effects of site preparation, fertilization and vegetation control on growth and stand development of planted loblolly pine , 2003 .

[60]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model , 1998 .

[61]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating different soil and plant hydraulic constraints on tree function using a model and sap flow data from ponderosa pine , 2001 .

[62]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  The Development of Pine Plantation Silviculture in the Southern United States , 2007 .

[63]  M. Williams,et al.  Applying a SPA model to examine the impact of climate change on GPP of open woodlands and the potential for woody thickening , 2011 .

[64]  F. Csillag,et al.  A comparison of three approaches for predicting C4 species cover of northern mixed grass prairie , 2003 .

[65]  B. Law,et al.  Use of a simulation model and ecosystem flux data to examine carbon-water interactions in ponderosa pine. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[66]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  A Method for Estimating Deciduous Competition in Pine Stands Using Landsat , 2012 .

[68]  M. Williams,et al.  An analysis of the sensitivity of sap flux to soil and plant variables assessed for an Australian woodland using a soil-plant-atmosphere model. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[69]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants , 1984 .

[70]  E. Rastetter,et al.  The controls on net ecosystem productivity along an Arctic transect: a model comparison with flux measurements , 2000, Global change biology.

[71]  D. Tyler,et al.  SP701-A-Growing and Harvesting Switchgrass for Ethanol Production in Tennessee , 2008 .

[72]  N. Stark,et al.  Timber harvesting: effects on degradation of cellulose and lignin , 1987 .

[73]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I , 1981, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology.

[74]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[75]  D. Whitehead,et al.  STOMATAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES IN TWO TROPICAL FOREST SPECIES DURING THE DRY SEASON IN NIGERIA , 1981 .

[76]  M. Trnka,et al.  The Challenge of Lignocellulosic Bioenergy in a Water-Limited World , 2013 .

[77]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Variation in Quantum Yield for CO(2) Uptake among C(3) and C(4) Plants. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[78]  R. Brown,et al.  Biochemical Basis for Plant Competition , 1969, Weed Science.

[79]  S. V. Caemmerer,et al.  Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. , 2000 .

[80]  O. Björkman.  Responses to Different Quantum Flux Densities , 1981 .

[81]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Using simple environmental variables to estimate below-ground productivity in grasslands , 2002 .

[82]  D. Timlin,et al.  Canopy photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, leaf nitrogen, and transcription profiles of maize in response to CO2 enrichment , 2006 .

[83]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Responses of apple leaf stomata: a model for single leaves and a whole tree , 1980 .

[84]  G. Edwards,et al.  Photosynthesis and nonstructural carbohydrate concentration in leaf blades of Panicum virgatum as affected by night temperature , 1978 .

[85]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[86]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Miscanthus and switchgrass production in central Illinois: impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[87]  G. Katul,et al.  Modelling the limits on the response of net carbon exchange to fertilization in a south-eastern pine forest , 2002 .

[88]  C. Gough,et al.  Seasonal Photosynthesis in Fertilized and Nonfertilized Loblolly Pine , 2004 .

[89]  G. G. Pohlman.  Soil Science Society of America , 1940 .

[90]  P. Jarvis.  The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[91]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems , 2000 .

[92]  Jennifer J. Swenson,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods to Estimate Evapotranspiration in Two Contrasting Loblolly Pine Plantations: Age-Related Changes in Water Use and Drought Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration Components , 2012 .

[93]  D. Gibson,et al.  Physiological Performance of Andropogon gerardii, Panicum virgatum, and Sorghastrum nutans on Reclaimed Mine Spoil , 1996 .