A model for face-turned surface microgeometry Application to the analysis of metallic static seals

Abstract In general, to construct a model of surface microgeometry, one must perform a statistical analysis of peaks (that is, obtain information on the altitude of the peaks’ summits and occasionally the peaks’ radii as well) involving in the main isotropic surfaces. This paper is essentially devoted to the application of this technique to anisotropic surfaces such as those obtained by face turning. Additionally, the classical distribution of peak dimensions was completed by a statistical analysis of valleys. Valley dimensions play a key role in various tribological phenomena such as static sealing applications where leakage arises from fluid circulation along the valleys. The present approach reveals that sealing performance is not only due to the amplitude of roughness (i.e. R a parameter) but also due to the variability of valley altitudes.

[1]  D. Whitehouse,et al.  The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  John I. McCool,et al.  Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces , 1986 .

[3]  B. Paffoni,et al.  Load transmission by elastic, elasto-plastic or fully plastic deformation of rough interface asperities , 2001 .

[4]  H. Cheng,et al.  An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication , 1978 .

[5]  M. O'callaghan,et al.  Static contact under load between nominally flat surfaces in which deformation is purely elastic , 1976 .

[6]  F. Robbe-Valloire.  Statistical analysis of asperities on a rough surface , 2001 .

[7]  Izhak Etsion,et al.  A Model for the Static Sealing Performance of Compliant Metallic Gas Seals Including Surface Roughness and Rarefaction Effects , 2000 .

[8]  J. Horng,et al.  An Elliptic Elastic-Plastic Asperity Microcontact Model for Rough Surfaces , 1998 .

[9]  H. A. Francis.  Application of spherical indentation mechanics to reversible and irreversible contact between rough surfaces , 1977 .

[10]  J. W. Kannel,et al.  Analyses of the Role of Surface Roughness on Contact Stresses Between Elastic Cylinders With and Without Soft Surface Coating , 1989 .

[11]  F. Plouraboué,et al.  Conductances between confined rough walls , 2004 .

[12]  J. Williamson,et al.  On the plastic contact of rough surfaces , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  M. Prat,et al.  On the Leak Through a Spiral-Groove Metallic Static Ring Gasket , 2004 .

[14]  P. Nayak,et al.  Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces , 1971 .

[15]  Surface roughness and deformation of contact asperities between a rough and a flat surface , 1975 .

[16]  K. J. Stout,et al.  Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three- dimensional surface topography: III: Parameters for characterising amplitude and some functional properties , 1994 .

[17]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  G. Rowe,et al.  An analysis of changes in surface topography during running-in of plain bearings , 1979 .

[19]  C. F. Fahl.  Motif combination — a new approach to surface profile analysis , 1982 .

[20]  K J Stout,et al.  Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions , 2000 .

[21]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .