It's a match when green meets healthy in sustainability labeling

Abstract The environmental conscientiousness food trend is only expected to increase as consumers demand more information on the environmental and social impacts of their food purchases. Drawing from consumers' lay theories and the match-up hypothesis, this study examines the influence of the interaction between healthiness and sustainability levels on consumer product evaluations. In particular, it argues that the fit between healthiness and sustainability (both high or both low) drives consumer buying preferences as well as product perceptions. However, a general skepticism in sustainability claims moderates this effect.

[1]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[2]  P. Rozin,et al.  Lay American conceptions of nutrition: dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  A. Scannell,et al.  Consumers' expectations and needs towards healthy cereal based snacks , 2013 .

[4]  A. Carlsson-kanyama.  Climate change and dietary choices -- how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? , 1998 .

[5]  Stephen J. Grove,et al.  Environmental Advertising Claims: A Preliminary Investigation , 1991 .

[6]  Michael A. Kamins.  An Investigation into the “Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep , 1990 .

[7]  Yeolib Kim,et al.  Overcoming Consumer Skepticism in Cause-Related Marketing: The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Donation Size Claim Objectivity , 2009 .

[8]  Larry Percy,et al.  Attitude Change through Visual Imagery in Advertising , 1980 .

[9]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis , 2016, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[10]  K. Grunert,et al.  Sustainability Labels on Food Products: Consumer Motivation, Understanding and Use , 2014 .

[11]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[12]  Yong-Soon Kang,et al.  Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects , 2006 .

[13]  Yoon-Na Cho,et al.  Different Shades of Green Consciousness: The Interplay of Sustainability Labeling and Environmental Impact on Product Evaluations , 2015 .

[14]  J. Lynch,et al.  The matchup effect of spokesperson and product congruency: A schema theory interpretation , 1994 .

[15]  Howard G. Lavine,et al.  Cognitive Processing and the Functional Matching Effect in Persuasion: The Mediating Role of Subjective Perceptions of Message Quality , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[16]  Richard N. Cardozo.  An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction , 1965 .

[17]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[18]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  Can health “halos” extend to food packaging? An investigation into food healthfulness perceptions and serving sizes on consumption decisions , 2017 .

[19]  Jeffrey K. Springston,et al.  How to Use Health and Nutrition–Related Claims Correctly on Food Advertising: Comparison of Benefit-Seeking, Risk-Avoidance, and Taste Appeals on Different Food Categories , 2014, Journal of health communication.

[20]  H. Paek,et al.  Are nutrient-content claims always effective? , 2012 .

[21]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising , 2010 .

[22]  E. H. Zandstra,et al.  Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS) , 2001, Appetite.

[23]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Rethinking the effect of perceived fit on customers’ evaluations of new products , 1995 .

[24]  Scot Burton,et al.  Making Healthful Food Choices: The Influence of Health Claims and Nutrition Information on Consumers’ Evaluations of Packaged Food Products and Restaurant Menu Items , 2003 .

[25]  Bert Weijters,et al.  The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption , 2016 .

[26]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[27]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns , 2003 .

[28]  Richard J. Vann,et al.  Leading the way: Motivating environmental action through perceived marketplace influence , 2017 .

[29]  Paula Varela,et al.  Effects of food package information and sensory characteristics on the perception of healthiness and the acceptability of enriched biscuits , 2012 .

[30]  S. Beatty,et al.  Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence: An assessment of recall and affect , 1990 .

[31]  Gerrit Antonides,et al.  Consumer segmentation based on food-category attribute importance : The relation with healthiness and sustainability perceptions , 2016 .

[32]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  The Development and Testing of a Measure of Skepticism Toward Environmental Claims in Marketers' Communications , 1998 .

[33]  Consumer responses to parodic ads , 2014 .

[34]  S. Frederick,et al.  The Limits of Attraction , 2014 .

[35]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products , 2006 .

[36]  Carolyn J. Simmons,et al.  Achieving Marketing Objectives through Social Sponsorships , 2006 .

[37]  Enrique Bigné Alcañiz,et al.  Alliances Between Brands and Social Causes: The Influence of Company Credibility on Social Responsibility Image , 2010 .

[38]  Wayne D. Hoyer.  An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product , 1984 .

[39]  R. Dhar,et al.  Proximity of snacks to beverages increases food consumption in the workplace: A field study , 2016, Appetite.

[40]  P. Homer,et al.  Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective , 1985 .

[41]  M. Forehand,et al.  When Is Honesty The Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism , 2002 .

[42]  Niels Jungbluth,et al.  Food purchases: Impacts from the consumers’ point of view investigated with a modular LCA , 2000 .

[43]  M. Geuens,et al.  Healthy or Unhealthy Slogans: That's the Question… , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[44]  Roland W Scholz,et al.  Toward a Sustainability Label for Food Products: An Analysis of Experts' and Consumers' Acceptance , 2010, Ecology of food and nutrition.

[45]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension , 1994 .

[46]  Darrel D. Muehling,et al.  “I Eat Organic for My Benefit and Yours”: Egoistic and Altruistic Considerations for Purchasing Organic Food and Their Implications for Advertising Strategists , 2014 .

[47]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  A Range Theory Account of Price Perception , 1999 .

[48]  Leila Elgaaied-Gambier,et al.  Shoppers’ grocery choices in the presence of generalized eco-labelling , 2015 .

[49]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[50]  Eric R. Spangenberg,et al.  Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising , 1998 .

[51]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  AD SKEPTICISM: The Consequences of Disbelief , 2005 .

[52]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Does better for the environment mean less tasty? Offering more climate-friendly meals is good for the environment and customer satisfaction , 2015, Appetite.