A blind, two-way crossover clinical trial was carried out to compare the effectiveness of plaque removal between a new, light energy conversion toothbrush incorporated with a semiconductor of TiO2 (test) and a similar toothbrush without the semiconductor (control). The study was completed by 73 school children aged 13-15 years. Each toothbrush was used for a period of 3 weeks. The mean differences between baseline plaque scores and after subjects used the test and control brushes were analyzed by the paired t-test. The Soladey 2 toothbrush showed significantly more reduction of plaque on the buccal surfaces of all teeth than the control brush. There was no significant difference in the plaque removing ability of the two brushes on the lingual aspects of the mandible and on the lingual surfaces of the maxillary posterior sextant. As the buccal surfaces are more likely to allow light to reach the semiconductor during brushing than the lingual areas, it is possible that the reported photocatalytic property of the semiconductor may be involved in some way in the observed reduction of plaque.
[1]
R. J. Hunt,et al.
Percent Agreement, Pearson's Correlation, and Kappa as Measures of Inter-examiner Reliability
,
1986,
Journal of dental research.
[2]
G A QUIGLEY,et al.
Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing.
,
1962,
Journal of the American Dental Association.
[3]
S. Joyston-Bechal,et al.
Clinical evaluation of plaque removal with a double-headed toothbrush.
,
1988,
Journal of clinical periodontology.
[4]
I Glickman,et al.
Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C.
,
1970,
Journal of periodontology.