Dose-response relationship of a new Timothy grass pollen allergoid in comparison to a 6-grass pollen allergoid Condensed title for a running head : Dose-response relationship of a Timothy grass pollen allergoid

Background: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy with grass pollen allergoids has been proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Based on the extensive cross-reactivity among Pooideae species, it has been suggested that grass pollen extracts could be prepared from a single species, rather than from a multiple species mixture. Objective: To find the optimal dose of a Phleum pratense allergoid preparation and compare its efficacy and safety to a 6-grass pollen allergoid preparation. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EudraCT: 2011-000674-58), 3 doses of Phleum pratense allergoid (1800 Therapeutic Units (TU), standard dose 6000 TU, and 18000 TU) were compared with placebo and the marketed 6-grass pollen allergoid (6000 TU). In a preseasonal dosing regimen, 102 patients were randomized to 5 treatment groups and received 9 subcutaneous injections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in wheal size (late phase reaction, LPR) in response to the intracutaneous testing (ICT) before and after treatment, comparing the active allergoids to placebo. Secondary outcomes were the change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) assessed in the allergen exposure chamber (AEC), the changes in Phleum pratense-serum specific IgG4, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: All 3 doses of the Phleum pratense and the 6-grass pollen allergoid preparations were significantly superior to placebo for the primary outcome, whereas there were no significant differences in the change in TNSS. Compared to the standard dose, the high dose of Phleum pratense did not produce any additional significant benefit, but showed a slight increase in AEs. Yet this increase in AEs was lower than for the 6-grass pollen preparation. Conclusions & Clinical Relevance: The standard dose of the new Phleum pratense allergoid was comparable to the marketed 6-grass pollen preparation at equal dose for the parameters measured.

[1]  T. Zuberbier,et al.  Allergen exposure chambers: harmonizing current concepts and projecting the needs for the future – an EAACI Position Paper , 2017, Allergy.

[2]  D. Bernstein,et al.  Onset and dose-related efficacy of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablets in an environmental exposure chamber. , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  A. Togias,et al.  Effect of grass pollen immunotherapy on clinical and local immune response to nasal allergen challenge , 2015, Allergy.

[4]  S. Vieths,et al.  Environmental exposure chambers in allergen immunotherapy trials: Current status and clinical validation needs. , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Responsiveness to timothy grass pollen in individuals without known natural exposure in an allergen challenge chamber. , 2015, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[6]  H. Sitter,et al.  Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases , 2014, Allergo Journal International.

[7]  C. Akdis,et al.  Modulation of immune responses by immunotherapy in allergic diseases. , 2014, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[8]  E. James,et al.  Grass‐specific CD4+ T‐cells exhibit varying degrees of cross‐reactivity, implications for allergen‐specific immunotherapy , 2014, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[9]  R. Valenta,et al.  Multiple grass mixes as opposed to single grasses for allergen immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis , 2013, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[10]  A. Salapatek,et al.  Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study of new recombinant hypoallergenic Bet v 1 in an environmental exposure chamber , 2013, Allergy.

[11]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Responses to ragweed pollen in a pollen challenge chamber versus seasonal exposure identify allergic rhinoconjunctivitis endotypes. , 2012, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  J. Bernstein Correlation between a pollen challenge chamber and a natural allergen exposure study design for eliciting ocular and nasal symptoms: early evidence supporting a paradigm shift in drug investigation? , 2012, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[13]  P. Demoly,et al.  European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force report on ‘dose–response relationship in allergen‐specific immunotherapy’ , 2011, Allergy.

[14]  C. Akdis,et al.  Mechanisms of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. , 2011, Immunology and allergy clinics of North America.

[15]  N. Krug,et al.  Anti-allergic drug testing in an environmental challenge chamber is suitable both in and out of the relevant pollen season. , 2011, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[16]  J. Holm,et al.  Single-Species Grass Pollen Extracts and Mixtures of Extracts From Multiple Phylogenetically Related Grass Species Activate Allergic Patients' Basophils to the Same Degree , 2011 .

[17]  P. Devillier,et al.  The allergen challenge chamber: a valuable tool for optimizing the clinical development of pollen immunotherapy , 2011, Allergy.

[18]  T. Holland-Letz,et al.  Diagnostic value of outcome measures following allergen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber compared with natural conditions , 2010, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[19]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Towards evidence‐based medicine in specific grass pollen immunotherapy , 2010, Allergy.

[20]  E. Ezan,et al.  Molecular variability of group 1 and 5 grass pollen allergens between Pooideae species: implications for immunotherapy , 2010, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[21]  R. Weber,et al.  Extensive IgE Cross-Reactivity towards the Pooideae Grasses Substantiated for a Large Number of Grass-Pollen-Sensitized Subjects , 2009, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[22]  H. Ipsen,et al.  Phleum pratense alone is sufficient for allergen‐specific immunotherapy against allergy to Pooideae grass pollens , 2009, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[23]  J. Kleine‐Tebbe One grass or many? Does allergy distinguish among species? , 2008, Drugs of today.

[24]  C. Akdis,et al.  Distinct regulation of IgE, IgG4 and IgA by T regulatory cells and toll‐like receptors , 2008, Allergy.

[25]  S. Scheurer,et al.  The Principle of Homologous Groups in Regulatory Affairs of Allergen Products – A Proposal , 2008, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[26]  S. Durham,et al.  Grass pollen immunotherapy: IL-10 induction and suppression of late responses precedes IgG4 inhibitory antibody activity. , 2008, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[27]  Linda Cox,et al.  Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. , 2008, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[28]  P. J. Barnes,et al.  Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[29]  S. Bonini,et al.  Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe , 2007, Allergy.

[30]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  J. Bousquet,et al.  Standards for practical allergen‐specific immunotherapy , 2006, Allergy.

[32]  A. Narkus,et al.  Efficacy and safety of preseasonal‐specific immunotherapy with an aluminium‐adsorbed six‐grass pollen allergoid , 2005, Allergy.

[33]  N. Krug,et al.  Validation of an environmental exposure unit for controlled human inhalation studies with grass pollen in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis , 2003, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[34]  R. Weber Patterns of pollen cross-allergenicity. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[35]  A. Kay,et al.  Effect of T-cell peptides derived from Fel d 1 on allergic reactions and cytokine production in patients sensitive to cats: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[36]  S. Durham,et al.  Grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy for seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized controlled trial , 2002, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[37]  S. Durham,et al.  Allergen immunotherapy: does it work and, if so, how and for how long? , 2000, Thorax.

[38]  C. Akdis,et al.  Role of interleukin 10 in specific immunotherapy. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[39]  P. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. , 1994, Biometrics.

[40]  E. Pastorello,et al.  Clinical and immunological effects of immunotherapy with alum‐absorbed grass allergoid in grass‐pollen‐induced hay fever , 1992, Allergy.

[41]  R. Naclerio,et al.  Effects of immunotherapy on the early, late, and rechallenge nasal reaction to provocation with allergen: changes in inflammatory mediators and cells. , 1991, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[42]  B. Whisman,et al.  The relationships between late cutaneous responses and specific antibody responses with outcome of immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. , 1989, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[43]  J. Verstraeten,et al.  Clinical evaluation of hyposensitization in allergic rhinitis: comparison of the results obtained with three different extracts. Material from a 3-year study. , 1987, Annals of allergy.

[44]  L. Sandvik,et al.  Clinical effects of hyposensitization using a purified allergen preparation from Timothy pollen as compared to crude aqueous extracts from Timothy pollen and a four‐grass pollen mixture respectively , 1983, Clinical allergy.

[45]  L. Lichtenstein,et al.  Studies on allergoids from naturally occurring allergens. III. Preparation of ragweed pollen allergoids by aldehyde modification in two steps. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[46]  M. Fernández-Rivas,et al.  Immunotherapy with a Phleum pratense allergen extract induces an immune response to a grass-mix allergen extract. , 2010, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[47]  E. Enrique,et al.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with Parietaria judaica: clinical efficacy and tolerance. , 2005, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[48]  R. Valenta,et al.  T-cell epitopes of Phl p 1, major pollen allergen of timothy grass (Phleum pratense): evidence for crossreacting and non-crossreacting T-cell epitopes within grass group I allergens. , 1995, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.