A switching control method for stabilizing a nonholonomic mobile robot using invariant manifold method

A system with nonholonomic constraints attracts its attention from the viewpoint of control theory because any conventional control cannot be applied directly to such a system. Since it cannot be stabilized by a static continuous feedback with constant gains, there are several control methods up to now by using a chained form etc. Among them, a switching control method using invariant manifold, which is considered as a generalized form for sliding mode control known as one of conventional switching control methods, and a quasi-continuous exponential stabilizing control method are proposed in a power form system with two inputs and three states or two inputs and n-states. In this study, as a new mehod, a switching control method using an invariant manifold as mentioned above is examined for a “double integrator system,” known as an alternative canonical model for nonholonomic systems. In particular, stabilizing controllers are derived for the case of a kinematic model with two inputs and three states and for the case of a dynamic model with two inputs and five states, which is just as an “extended double integrator system.” The effectiveness of the proposed controllers is demonstrated through simulations for a mobile robot with two independent driving wheels.

[1]  M. Corless,et al.  Invariant manifold techniques for attitude control of symmetric spacecraft , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  O. J. Sørdalen,et al.  Exponential stabilization of nonholonomic chained systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Control of a nonholonomic mobile robot: backstepping kinematics into dynamics , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  C. C. Wit,et al.  On the Construction of Stabilizing Discontinuous Controllers for Nonholonomic Systems , 1995 .

[5]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Quasi-Continuous Exponential Stabilizers for Nonholonomic Systems , 1996 .

[6]  A. Astolfi Discontinuous control of nonholonomic systems , 1996 .

[7]  Sergey V. Drakunov,et al.  Stabilization and tracking in the nonholonomic integrator via sliding modes , 1996 .

[8]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Control of a nonholomic mobile robot: Backstepping kinematics into dynamics , 1997 .

[9]  Panagiotis Tsiotras Invariant manifold techniques for control of underactuated mechanical systems , 1997 .

[10]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Regulation and tracking of the nonholonomic double integrator: A field-oriented control approach , 1998, Autom..

[11]  P. Tsiotras,et al.  Exponentially convergent control laws for nonholonomic systems in power form 1 1 Supported in part b , 1998 .

[12]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Control of a nonholonomic mobile robot using neural networks , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Stabilization of nonholonomic integrators via logic-based switching , 1999, Autom..

[14]  Antonio Pedro Aguiar,et al.  Stabilization of the Extended Nonholonomic Double Integrator Via Logic-Based Hybrid Control , 2000 .

[15]  Weiliang Xu,et al.  Variable structure exponential stabilization of chained systems based on the extended nonholonomic integrator , 2000 .

[16]  Ahmed Rachid,et al.  Invariant Manifold Approach for the Stabilization of Nonholonomic Chained Systems: Application to a Mobile Robot , 2001 .