Adapted random sampling patterns for accelerated MRI

ObjectiveVariable density random sampling patterns have recently become increasingly popular for accelerated imaging strategies, as they lead to incoherent aliasing artifacts. However, the design of these sampling patterns is still an open problem. Current strategies use model assumptions like polynomials of different order to generate a probability density function that is then used to generate the sampling pattern. This approach relies on the optimization of design parameters which is very time consuming and therefore impractical for daily clinical use.Materials and methodsThis work presents a new approach that generates sampling patterns by making use of power spectra of existing reference data sets and hence requires neither parameter tuning nor an a priori mathematical model of the density of sampling points.ResultsThe approach is validated with downsampling experiments, as well as with accelerated in vivo measurements. The proposed approach is compared with established sampling patterns, and the generalization potential is tested by using a range of reference images. Quantitative evaluation is performed for the downsampling experiments using RMS differences to the original, fully sampled data set.ConclusionOur results demonstrate that the image quality of the method presented in this paper is comparable to that of an established model-based strategy when optimization of the model parameter is carried out and yields superior results to non-optimized model parameters. However, no random sampling pattern showed superior performance when compared to conventional Cartesian subsampling for the considered reconstruction strategy.

[1]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Fast 3D imaging using variable‐density spiral trajectories with applications to limb perfusion , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  D. Nishimura,et al.  Reduced aliasing artifacts using variable‐density k‐space sampling trajectories , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA) , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Andreas Greiser,et al.  Efficient k‐space sampling by density‐weighted phase‐encoding , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  M. Lustig,et al.  SPIRiT: Iterative self‐consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k‐space , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  D C Noll,et al.  Consistent projection reconstruction (CPR) techniques for MRI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  K. T. Block,et al.  Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Marseille,et al.  Nonuniform Phase-Encode Distributions for MRI Scan Time Reduction , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[12]  M. Lustig,et al.  Compressed Sensing MRI , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.