Verb-first constructions as a syntactic and functional resource in (spoken) Swedish

This paper explores different syntactic variations and functional properties of clausal units that are initiated by the finite verb in Swedish. We focus on V1 constructions that are basically declarative in function, thus excluding interrogative, conditional and directive uses. Because V1 constructions, and particularly certain variants of them, are typical of spoken Swedish, our examples and analyses focus primarily on the usage in speaking. The V1 constructions studied include whole-utterance constructions in conversational sequences, utterance-internal extensions, and utterance-internal reshapings, such as syntactic blends. We will offer an analysis of (declarative) V1 constructions, which in some respects differs from analyses proposed by generative syntacticians or traditional grammarians. Our analysis of the constructional resource is discourse oriented. In this perspective, V1 constructions are analyzable as sequentially dependent, second, or ‘subsequent’ moves, viz. units that can scarcely initiate a communicative project but which instead continue, extend or comment on an already initiated project. Thus, rather than analyzing V1 constructions as one type of ellipsis they could be seen as full-fledged clausal units whose existence is conditioned by their position in a discourse or utterance context. From a theoretical perspective, this paper is a contribution to an emerging dialogical or interactional model of (Swedish) grammar.

[1]  Maria Mörnsjö.  V1 Declaratives in Spoken Swedish : Syntax, Information Structure, and Prosodic Pattern , 2002 .

[2]  Jan Lindström,et al.  Grammar in the Service of Interaction: Exploring Turn Organization in Swedish , 2006 .

[3]  Anna K. Lindstrom.  Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings , 1994, Language in Society.

[4]  D. Schiffrin,et al.  Conditionals as topics in discourse , 1992 .

[5]  Gene H. Lerner.  On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[6]  Holger Diessel.  Verb-First Constructions in German , 1997 .

[7]  Erik Magnusson.  Subject omission and verb initial declaratives in Swedish , 2003 .

[8]  Mats Eriksson.  Ungdomars berättande : En studie i struktur och interaktion , 1997 .

[9]  Roy Harris,et al.  The Language Myth , 1981 .

[10]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies , 1989 .

[11]  Elise Kärkkäinen,et al.  Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think , 2003 .

[12]  Cecilia E. Ford.  Contingency and Units in Interaction , 2004 .

[13]  Marjolyn Verspoor,et al.  Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning : proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995 , 1997 .

[14]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns , 1996 .

[15]  E. Schegloff.  Interaction and grammar: Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction , 1996 .

[16]  Christer Platzack.  The Case of Narrative Inversion in Swedish and Icelandic , 1987 .

[17]  Gene H. Lerner.  Interaction and grammar: On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker , 1996 .

[18]  Per Linell,et al.  Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives , 1998 .

[19]  John Haiman,et al.  Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion , 1985 .

[20]  Jan-Ola Östman,et al.  You Know: A Discourse-Functional Approach , 1984 .

[21]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .