The effect of ergometer design on rowing stroke mechanics

The effect of rowing ergometer design upon power delivery and coordination patterns of the rowing stroke was analyzed for 14 elite rowers. Rowers were tested in three ergometer conditions: the fixed stretcher Concept2c ergometer, the Concept2c ergometer mounted on sliding rails, and the sliding stretcher RowPerfect ergometer. Ergometers were instrumented to measure the external force generated at the handle and the foot stretcher and a nine‐segment inverse dynamics model used to calculate joint and overall power delivery. Peak power generation and absorption at the knee joint was significantly greater, and total power delivered to the ergometer delayed on the fixed stretcher ergometer when compared to the sliding stretcher ergometers. No differences were found in the mechanical energy delivered to the handle of the three ergometers; however, greater joint mechanical energy production of the lower limb reduced mechanical efficiency when rowing the Concept2c fixed ergometer. The fixed foot stretcher on the Concept2c fixed ergometer acts to increase the inertial forces that the rower must overcome at the catch, increasing the moment and power output at the knee, and affecting the coordination pattern during the recovery phase.

[1]  R W Norman,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W. Spinks,et al.  Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. , 1995, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Clara Soper,et al.  Towards an Ideal Rowing Technique for Performance , 2004, Sports medicine.

[4]  P. Sinclair,et al.  Relative shank to thigh length is associated with different mechanisms of power production during elite male ergometer rowing , 2009, Sports biomechanics.

[5]  Patria A Hume,et al.  Reliability of power output during rowing changes with ergometer type and race distance. , 2004, Sports biomechanics.

[6]  Thomas S. Buchanan,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF HUMAN MOVEMENT , 2005 .

[7]  W G Hopkins,et al.  High reliability of performance of well-trained rowers on a rowing ergometer. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[8]  Winter Da,et al.  Pathologic gait diagnosis with computer-averaged electromyographic profiles. , 1984 .

[9]  D A Winter,et al.  Pathologic gait diagnosis with computer-averaged electromyographic profiles. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  L Chèze,et al.  Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers: Mechanical aspects , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  D. Lamb,et al.  A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Mechanics and Biomechanics of Rowing: A Review , 1991 .

[13]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  E. Kreighbaum,et al.  Biomechanics: A Qualitative Approach for Studying Human Movement , 1981 .

[15]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[16]  T P Martin,et al.  Effect of stroke rate on velocity of a rowing shell. , 1980, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  K Affeld,et al.  Assessment of rowing efficiency. , 1993, International journal of sports medicine.

[18]  Mathijs J Hofmijster,et al.  Rowing skill affects power loss on a modified rowing ergometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  A. Mader,et al.  Peak force, velocity, and power during five and ten maximal rowing ergometer strokes by world class female and male rowers. , 1993, International journal of sports medicine.

[20]  H E Veeger,et al.  The position of the rotation center of the glenohumeral joint. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Mechanical efficiency of rowing a single scull , 1993 .

[22]  Sara Horne,et al.  The impact of ergometer design on hip and trunk muscle activity patterns in elite rowers: an electromyographic assessment. , 2005, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[23]  R. Woledge,et al.  An ergonomic comparison of rowing machine designs: possible implications for safety , 2002, British journal of sports medicine.

[24]  M. Bourdin,et al.  Peak power output predicts rowing ergometer performance in elite male rowers. , 2004, International journal of sports medicine.

[25]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[26]  G. Giakas,et al.  Optimal digital filtering requires a different cut-off frequency strategy for the determination of the higher derivatives. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Gregory P. Whyte,et al.  Determinants of 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[28]  J D Wilson,et al.  The Rowing Cycle: Sources of Variance and Invariance in Ergometer and On-the-Water Performance. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.