Effect of p16 Status on Survival Outcomes in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE Evaluate the effect of p16 status on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) undergoing treatment with curative intent; and to assess how p16 status may affect patterns of recurrence. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary medical center. METHODS Patients with sinonasal SCC treated with curative intent from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Independent variable of interest was p16 status, which was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a 70% staining cutoff for positivity. Kaplan Meier survival curve was plotted to assess correlation between p16 status and DFS and OS. Association between recurrence patterns and p16 status was conducted using chi square and fisher's exact tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to assess association between independent variables and DFS. RESULTS Fifty patients with sinonasal SCC met inclusion criteria. Patients were p16 positive in 28/50 (56%) of cases. Kaplan Meier survival curve revealed no statistically significant association between p16 status and DFS or OS survival (P = .780, P = .474). There was no difference in recurrence patterns in patients with p16 positive versus negative tumors. CONCLUSION p16 status did not have prognostic value on DFS and OS in our cohort of patients with sinonasal SCC undergoing treatment with curative intent. There was no difference in recurrence patterns between the 2 populations. Based on the results of this study, p16 status should not impact counseling of patients as it relates to their prognosis from SNM.

[1]  James J. Evans,et al.  Treatment‐related morbidity in patients treated for sinonasal malignancy , 2020, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[2]  J. Eloy,et al.  Significance of human papillomavirus positivity in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma , 2017, International forum of allergy & rhinology.

[3]  O. Tawfik,et al.  Outcomes of HPV‐related nasal squamous cell carcinoma , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  J. Eloy,et al.  Survival, Morbidity, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies. , 2017, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[5]  S. Thavaraj Human papillomavirus-associated neoplasms of the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx. , 2016, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[6]  J. Lewis Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review with Emphasis on Emerging Histologic Subtypes and the Role of Human Papillomavirus , 2016, Head and Neck Pathology.

[7]  E. Vokes,et al.  HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  J. Michálek,et al.  The presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA transcripts in a subset of sinonasal carcinomas is evidence of involvement of HPV in its etiopathogenesis , 2015, Virchows Archiv.

[9]  B. Haughey,et al.  Prognostic factors and survival unique to surgically treated p16+ oropharyngeal cancer , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  J. Turner,et al.  Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: A historical analysis of population‐based data , 2012, Head & neck.

[11]  J. Waldron,et al.  Atypical clinical behavior of p16-confirmed HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  W. Quint,et al.  Human papillomaviruses are identified in a subgroup of sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas with favorable outcome , 2009, Cancer.

[13]  A. Cmelak,et al.  Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  F. Claus,et al.  Postoperative intensity‐modulated radiotherapy in sinonasal carcinoma , 2005, Cancer.

[15]  J. Cooper Ajcc Cancer Staging Manual , 1997 .