Information Cascades on Arbitrary Topologies

In this paper, we study information cascades on graphs. In this setting, each node in the graph represents a person. One after another, each person has to take a decision based on a private signal as well as the decisions made by earlier neighboring nodes. Such information cascades commonly occur in practice and have been studied in complete graphs where everyone can overhear the decisions of every other player. It is known that information cascades can be fragile and based on very little information, and that they have a high likelihood of being wrong. Generalizing the problem to arbitrary graphs reveals interesting insights. In particular, we show that in a random graph $G(n,q)$, for the right value of $q$, the number of nodes making a wrong decision is logarithmic in $n$. That is, in the limit for large $n$, the fraction of players that make a wrong decision tends to zero. This is intriguing because it contrasts to the two natural corner cases: empty graph (everyone decides independently based on his private signal) and complete graph (all decisions are heard by all nodes). In both of these cases a constant fraction of nodes make a wrong decision in expectation. Thus, our result shows that while both too little and too much information sharing causes nodes to take wrong decisions, for exactly the right amount of information sharing, asymptotically everyone can be right. We further show that this result in random graphs is asymptotically optimal for any topology, even if nodes follow a globally optimal algorithmic strategy. Based on the analysis of random graphs, we explore how topology impacts global performance and construct an optimal deterministic topology among layer graphs.

[1]  D. Krackhardt A Plunge into Networks , 2009, Science.

[2]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Scheduling a Cascade with Opposing Influences , 2013, SAGT.

[3]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[4]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Bayesian learning in social networks , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Classroom Games: Information Cascades , 1996 .

[6]  Lones Smith,et al.  Pathological Outcomes of Observational Learning , 2000 .

[7]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[10]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case Equilibria , 1999, STACS.

[11]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks , 2010, Dyn. Games Appl..

[12]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[13]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[14]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  How to schedule a cascade in an arbitrary graph , 2012, EC '12.

[15]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  How Bad is Forming Your Own Opinion? , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[16]  B. Golub,et al.  Naive Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence and Wisdom of Crowds , 2007 .

[17]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[18]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Information Cascades in the Laboratory , 1998 .

[19]  Lones Smith,et al.  Rational Social Learning by Random Sampling , 2013 .

[20]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  The polarizing effect of network influences , 2014, EC.

[21]  I. Welch Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades , 1992 .