Simulation as Science Discovery: Ways of Interactive Meaning-Making

This article addresses how computer-based simulations may support conceptual learning in science education. The study investigates how these interactions unfold, and explores how it may inform design. The article reports on project-based learning in schools where four pairs of students from upper secondary school use a future climate simulator integrated in a web-based learning environment. Our analytical focus is on how the students make use of the simulator to make meaning through the process. The analysis shows a considerable variety in how the students interact with the simulator, and in how they engage in a conceptual level of understanding. The findings indicate that the design was engaging, and three main modes of surprisingly stable uses were identified: utilizing the simulator as a way to get facts, enjoying the aesthetics of interaction as playability, and finally, making use of the simulator as a tool for discovery through cumulative micro-experiments.

[1]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[2]  J. Durlak.  The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[3]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix , 2004 .

[5]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[6]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[7]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  Problem-Solving Behaviors during a Genetics Computer Simulation: Beyond the Expert/Novice Dichotomy , 1993 .

[8]  Hans Christian Arnseth,et al.  Approaching institutional contexts: systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[9]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: experimental research , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[11]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Scientific Reasoning Across Different Domains , 1992 .

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Use of Heuristics to Facilitate Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Learning Environment in a Physics Domain , 2006 .

[13]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  What does it mean? Students’ procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[14]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[16]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[18]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Comparison of Learning Environments: All That Glitters , 1992 .

[19]  W. Frawley.  Mind as Action , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[21]  R. Azevedo.  Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[22]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[24]  Joan Solomon.  Playing and Exploring , 1986 .

[25]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers As Cognitive Tools , 2020 .

[26]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving , 1992 .

[27]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[29]  Anniken Furberg,et al.  Scientific Inquiry in Web-based Learning Environments : Exploring technological, epistemic and institutional aspects of students’ meaning making , 2009 .

[30]  Christine Chin,et al.  Learning in Science: A Comparison of Deep and Surface Approaches. , 2000 .

[31]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  The Complexity of Distributed Collaborative Learning: Unit of Analysis , 2007 .

[32]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[34]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation , 1991 .

[35]  T. Jong,et al.  Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning , 2007 .