Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: evidence from reading Chinese as a second language.

In the present study, we manipulated different types of information available in the parafovea during the reading of Chinese sentences and examined how native Korean readers who learned Chinese as a second language make use of the parafoveal information. Results clearly indicate that, only identical and orthographically similar previews facilitated processing of the target words when they were subsequently fixated. More critically, more parafoveal information was obtained by subjects with higher reading proficiency. These results suggest that, mainly low-level features of the parafoveal words are obtained by the non-native Chinese readers and less attentional resources are available for the readers with lower reading proficiency, thereby causing a reduction of the perceptual span.

[1]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[4]  Jie-Li Tsai,et al.  Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. , 2009 .

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model , 2012, Visual cognition.

[8]  Ming Yan,et al.  Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements , 2012, Reading and writing.

[12]  Ming Yan,et al.  Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: a comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  K. Rayner.  The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  K Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  H. Shu,et al.  Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  Nathalie N. Bélanger,et al.  Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Ming Yan,et al.  Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[23]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[24]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[26]  A. Inhoff,et al.  The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. Hung,et al.  Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[29]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .

[30]  D. Hung,et al.  Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences , 2004, Brain and Language.

[31]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Hua Shu,et al.  Rapid Automatized Naming and Its Unique Contribution to Reading: Evidence from Chinese Dyslexia , 2014 .

[34]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading , 2012, Reading and writing.

[35]  A Yonas,et al.  The effects of the reader's skill and the difficulty of the text on the perceptual span in reading. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.