Variability and Uncertainty Meet Risk Management and Risk Communication

In the past decade, the use of probabilistic risk analysis techniques to quantitatively address variability and uncertainty in risks increased in popularity as recommended by the 1994 National Research Council that wrote Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Under the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act, for example, the U.S. EPA supported the development of tools that produce distributions of risk demonstrating the variability and/or uncertainty in the results. This paradigm shift away from the use of point estimates creates new challenges for risk managers, who now struggle with decisions about how to use distributions in decision making. The challenges for risk communication, however, have only been minimally explored. This presentation uses the case studies of variability in the risks of dying on the ground from a crashing airplane and from the deployment of motor vehicle airbags to demonstrate how better characterization of variability and uncertainty in the risk assessment lead to better risk communication. Analogies to food safety and environmental risks are also discussed. This presentation demonstrates that probabilistic risk assessment has an impact on both risk management and risk communication, and highlights remaining research issues associated with using improved sensitivity and uncertainty analyses in risk assessment.

[1]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[2]  Scott C Ratzan Making Sense of Risk , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[3]  John D. Graham,et al.  Validating analytical judgments: the case of the airbag's lifesaving effectiveness , 1999 .

[4]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[5]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[6]  P. Corso,et al.  Valuing Mortality-Risk Reduction: Using Visual Aids to Improve the Validity of Contingent Valuation , 2001 .

[7]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs , 1999 .

[8]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Conceptual structure of the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  John D. Graham,et al.  Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management , 1996 .

[10]  John Haigh,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2003 .

[11]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[12]  R P Rechard,et al.  Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[14]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output , 1999, Technometrics.

[15]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems , 1994 .

[17]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[18]  J. C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty , 1997 .

[19]  Helge Hove Haldorsen,et al.  Putting error bars on reservoir engineering forecasts , 1992 .

[20]  D Wartenberg,et al.  Risk to groundlings of death due to airplane accidents: a risk communication tool. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[22]  J D Graham Assessing and managing risks in a democratic society. Making sense of risk. , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for model output: performance of black box techniques on three international benchmark exercises , 1992 .

[24]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of air bags by seating position. , 1997, JAMA.

[25]  W. D. Rowe,et al.  Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[26]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques , 1990 .

[27]  R M Cooke,et al.  The risk of groundling fatalities from unintentional airplane crashes. , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  D. Vose Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .

[29]  Terry Andres,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of model output: an investigation of new techniques , 1993 .

[30]  Adam M. Finkel Stepping out of your own shadow: A didactic example of how facing uncertainty can improve decision-making , 1994 .