Sensing of Stimulus Artifact Suppressed Signals From Electrode Interfaces

Stimulus artifacts inhibit reliable acquisition of biological evoked potentials for several milliseconds if an electrode contact is utilized for both electrical stimulation and recording purposes. This hinders the measurement of evoked short-latency biological responses, which is otherwise elicited by stimulation in implantable prosthetic devices. We present an improved stimulus artifact suppression scheme using two electrode simultaneous stimulation and differential readout using high-gain amplifiers. Substantial reduction of artifact duration has been shown possible through the common-mode rejection property of an instrumentation amplifier for electrode interfaces. The performance of this method depends on good matching of electrode-electrolyte interface properties of the chosen electrode pair. A novel calibration algorithm has been developed that helps in artificial matching of impedance and thereby achieves the required performance in artifact suppression. Stimulus artifact duration has been reduced down to 50 μs from the stimulation-cum-recording electrodes, which is ~6× improvement over the present state of the art. The system is characterized with emulated resistor-capacitor loads and a variety of in-vitro metal electrodes dipped in saline environment. The proposed method is going to be useful for closed-loop electrical stimulation and recording studies, such as bidirectional neural prosthesis of retina, cochlea, brain, and spinal cord.

[1]  Yung-Chan Chen,et al.  A bidirectional, flexible neuro-electronic interface employing localised stimulation to reduce artifacts , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[2]  Andreas Demosthenous,et al.  An Integrated Amplifier With Passive Neutralization of Myoelectric Interference From Neural Recording Tripoles , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  R.A. Blum,et al.  Models of stimulation artifacts applied to integrated circuit design , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  Stimulus-Artifact Elimination in a Multi-Electrode System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[5]  H. Robinson,et al.  Simultaneous induction of pathway-specific potentiation and depression in networks of cortical neurons. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Cristina Roldan,et al.  Generalized alternating stimulation: A novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  E. McAdams,et al.  The linear and non-linear electrical properties of the electrode-electrolyte interface , 1995 .

[8]  R. Merletti,et al.  Suppression of stimulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Patrick E. Crago,et al.  Stimulus artifact removal in EMG from muscles adjacent to stimulated muscles , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Praveen Rajan Singh Micro-stimulator design for Retinal Prostheses , 2004 .

[11]  Gregory T. A. Kovacs,et al.  A closed-loop electrical stimulation system for cardiac cell cultures , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  James B. Fallon,et al.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Yasuhiko Jimbo,et al.  A system for MEA-based multisite stimulation , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ángel de la Torre,et al.  Reducing blanking artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[15]  Wael El-Deredy,et al.  Electrically evoked compound action potential artifact rejection by independent component analysis: Technique validation☆ , 2013, Hearing Research.

[16]  Fritz Buchthal,et al.  Low noise alternating current amplifier and compensator to reduce stimulus artefact , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[17]  Marcus A. Bearse,et al.  Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[18]  Tatyana I. Aksenova,et al.  Artifact Processor for Neuronal Activity Analysis during Deep Brain Stimulation , 2008, ICANN.

[19]  David A. Borkholder,et al.  Cell based biosensors using microelectrodes , 1998 .

[20]  Michael Bach,et al.  Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision , 1991 .

[21]  E. A. Brown,et al.  Stimulation and recording of neural tissue, closing the loop on the artifact , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[22]  Thomas Wichmann,et al.  A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Flexible Charge Balanced Stimulator With 5.6 fC Accuracy for 140 nC Injections , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[24]  R.R. Harrison,et al.  Microcontroller-Based Wireless Recording Unit for Neurodynamic Studies in Saltwater , 2006, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[25]  R.N. Scott,et al.  Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Stephen P. DeWeerth,et al.  An Integrated System for Simultaneous, Multichannel Neuronal Stimulation and Recording , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[27]  M. Dorman,et al.  Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  Kush Paul,et al.  Spectral cancellation of microstimulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  P. R. Troyk,et al.  Stimulus-resistant neural recording amplifier , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[30]  U. Frey,et al.  A CMOS-based microelectrode array for interaction with neuronal cultures , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  A Low-Cost Multielectrode System for Data Acquisition Enabling Real-Time Closed-Loop Processing with Rapid Recovery from Stimulation Artifacts , 2009, Front. Neuroeng..

[32]  Richard Grieve,et al.  Nonlinear adaptive filtering of stimulus artifact , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.