Improving the Generation of Decision Objectives

Real decision makers exhibit significant shortcomings in the generation of objectives for decisions that they face. Prior research has illustrated the magnitude of this shortcoming but not its causes. In this paper, we identify two distinct impediments to the generation of decision objectives: not thinking broadly enough about the range of relevant objectives, and not thinking deeply enough to articulate every objective within the range that is considered. To test these explanations and explore ways of stimulating a more comprehensive set of objectives, we present three experiments involving a variety of interventions: the provision of sample objectives, organization of objectives by category, and direct challenges to do better, with or without a warning that important objectives are missing. The use of category names and direct challenges with a warning both led to improvements in the quantity of objectives generated without impacting their quality; other interventions yielded less improvement. We conclude by discussing the relevance of our findings to decision analysis and offering prescriptive implications for the elicitation of decision objectives. In this version of the paper, “Improving the Generation of Decision Objectives” by Samuel D. Bond, Kurt A. Carlson, and Ralph L. Keeney, originally published online ahead of print March 10, 2010, the first panel heading of Figure 2 was corrected to read “Study 1 (Choice context = Dissertation),” as shown on page 243.

[1]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  How Can Decision Making Be Improved? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  D. Medin,et al.  The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. , 2004, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Tulving Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multi-trial free-recall learning , 1966 .

[4]  Y. Trope,et al.  Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[6]  C. Carver,et al.  Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. , 1999 .

[7]  Alec Morton,et al.  Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis: a guided tour , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  C. Kirkwood Strategic Decision Making , 1996 .

[9]  Kurt A. Carlson,et al.  Unrealistically Optimistic Consumers: A Selective Hypothesis Testing Account for Optimism in Predictions of Future Behavior , 2009 .

[10]  Edward Bradford Titchener,et al.  The Schema of Introspection , 2009 .

[11]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[12]  Denis M. Strachan,et al.  Resource-Limited Multiattribute Value Analysis of Alternatives for Immobilizing Radioactive Liquid Process Waste Stored in Saluggia, Italy , 2009, Decis. Anal..

[13]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[14]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[16]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[17]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[18]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  A cost-benefit mechanism for selecting problem-solving strategies: Some extensions and empirical tests , 1982 .

[19]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[20]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Consumer Judgment from a Dual-Systems Perspective , 2009 .

[21]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection. , 1979 .

[22]  P. Williams Practice management. , 2005, The Alpha omegan.

[23]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[24]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968. , 1969, M.D.Computing.

[25]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[26]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[27]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Developing a Foundation for Strategy at Seagate Software , 1999, Interfaces.

[28]  W. A. Bousfield The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[29]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[30]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. , 1996 .

[31]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[32]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[33]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Generating Objectives: Can Decision Makers Articulate What They Want? , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[35]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[36]  Robert L. Hudson,et al.  Category clustering as a function of level of information and number of stimulus presentations , 1968 .

[37]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Cue-dependent forgetting. , 1974 .

[38]  H. Pashler,et al.  Measuring the Crowd Within , 2008, Psychological science.

[39]  León Value-Focused Thinking versus Alternative-Focused Thinking: Effects on Generation of Objectives. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[40]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[41]  John C. Butler,et al.  Using Attributes to Predict Objectives in Preference Models , 2006, Decis. Anal..

[42]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[43]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Combining a Multiattribute Value Function with an Optimization Model: An Application to Dynamic Resource Allocation for Infrastructure Maintenance , 2009, Decis. Anal..

[44]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .