On the substantive primitives of morphosyntax and their parametrization: Northern Italian subject clitics

[1]  Leonardo M. Savoia,et al.  Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative , 2002 .

[2]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[3]  J. Windsor.  Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals by Ian Roberts (review) , 2014 .

[4]  D. Embick,et al.  Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[5]  H. Harley,et al.  Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Anca-Marina Velicu,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF CP AND IP THE CARTOGRAPHY OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[7]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency , 2000 .

[8]  Alessandra Giorgi,et al.  About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality , 2010 .

[9]  M. Rita Manzini.  PRO, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations , 2009 .

[10]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , 2009 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[12]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  The learnability of abstract syntactic principles , 2011, Cognition.

[13]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[14]  M. Loporcaro.  On triple auxiliation in Romance , 2007 .

[15]  M. R. Manzini,et al.  CASE AS DENOTATION: VARIATION IN ROMANCE , 2010 .

[16]  Leonardo M. Savoia,et al.  Null subjects without pro , 1997 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[18]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[19]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  The Phonology and Syntax of Preverbal and Postverbal Subject Clitics in Northern Italian Dialects , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  A. Sorace.  Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs. , 2000 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky.  Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[22]  J. Nichols.  Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time , 1992 .

[23]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals , 2010 .

[24]  Leonardo M. Savoia,et al.  Mesoclisis in the imperative: Phonology, morphology or syntax? , 2011 .

[25]  Valentina Bianchi,et al.  On the syntax of personal arguments , 2006 .

[26]  A. Kratzer.  Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[27]  Robert Rolf Noyer.  Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure , 1992 .

[28]  Tobias Scheer,et al.  A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories: How Extra-Phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale , 2010 .

[29]  L. Rizzi.  On the Status of Subject Clitics in Romance , 1986 .

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications , 2005, Cognition.

[31]  G. Cinque.  Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and Its Exceptions , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  Andrea Calabrese,et al.  Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance , 1998 .