Effects of On-Street Bicycle Facility Configuration on Bicyclist and Motorist Behavior

Growing awareness of environmental and public health problems associated with motorized transportation has led to a recent effort to promote nonmotorized modes of travel. Previous studies have shown that facility design plays a large role in encouraging bicycling. With the aim of defining the roadway configurations that lead to safe motorist and bicyclist behavior, this research examines the impact of design elements, including the type and width of the bicycle facility, the presence of adjacent motor vehicle traffic, parking turnover rate, land use, and the type of motorist-bicyclist interaction. Observational studies conducted at 48 sites in three large Texas cities characterize bicyclist and motorist behavior through lateral position measurements and instances of motorist encroachment on an adjacent lane. These observations were used to build two multivariate regression models and allowed for direct site-to-site comparisons. Notable results include the observation that bicycle lanes create a safer and more predictable riding environment relative to wide outside lanes, and that the provision of a buffer between parked cars and bicycle lanes is the only reliable method for ensuring that bicyclists do not put themselves at risk of being hit by opening car doors.

[1]  Melvin R. Ramey,et al.  Effects of Bike Lanes on Driver and Bicyclist Behavior , 1977 .

[2]  R. Meeusen,et al.  Cycling to work: influence on indexes of health in untrained men and women in Flanders. Coronary heart disease and quality of life , 2007, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[3]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[4]  W W Hunter,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF BIKE LANES ADJACENT TO MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING , 1999 .

[5]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[6]  E. K. Burns,et al.  Cycling to Work in Phoenix: Route Choice, Travel Behavior, and Commuter Characteristics , 2001 .

[7]  Lisa Aultman-Hall,et al.  Research Design Insights from a Survey of Urban Bicycle Commuters , 1998 .

[8]  K. Krizek,et al.  Analyzing the Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Commute Mode Share over Time , 2009 .

[9]  W Pein,et al.  THE NATIONAL BICYCLING AND WALKING STUDY: TRANSPORTATION CHOICES FOR A CHANGING AMERICA. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[10]  William W. Hunter,et al.  Conversions of wide curb lanes -- The effect on bicycle and motor vehicle interactions , 2005 .

[11]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Bicycle Level of Service for Arterials , 2007 .

[12]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[13]  Venkat R. Vattikuti,et al.  Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service , 1997 .

[14]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[15]  Jennifer Dill Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[16]  David L Harkey,et al.  Evaluation of Shared-Use Facilities for Bicycles and Motor Vehicles , 1997 .

[17]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Bicycle Journey-to-Work: Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes , 1997 .

[18]  Sally Jensen,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments , 2007 .

[19]  W. Moritz Adult Bicyclists in the United States: Characteristics and Riding Experience in 1996 , 1998 .

[20]  G. B. Rodgers Bicyclist deaths and fatality risk patterns. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.