Quantifying normative behaviour and precariousness in adaptive agency

An essential feature of autonomous adaptive agency is that a system behaves according to an intrinsic norm. In this paper, we illustrate and clarify this notion of “behavior according to an intrinsic norm” with a minimalistic model of agency. We present a minimal metabolic system whose auto-catalytic dynamics define a viability region for different concentrations of available resource or ‘food’ molecules. We initially consider the availability of food as a control parameter for metabolic dynamics. A bifurcation diagram shows that for fixed values of available food, there exists a viability region. This region has an non-zero stable equilibrium and a lower boundary that takes the form of an unstable equilibrium—below which, the tendency of the system is towards “death”, a stable equilibrium with a zero concentration of metabolites. We define the viability region as that in which the system tends toward the “living” stable-equilibrium. Outside of this region, in the precarious region, the system may live for some time but will eventually die if the food concentration does not change. With a precise definition of system-determined death, living, precarious and viable regions we move on to reconsider the available concentration of resources ([F ]), not as a free parameter of the system but as modulated by organismic behaviour. By coupling the metabolism to a behavioural mechanism, we simulate a stochastic, up-resource gradient climbing behaviour. As a result, the effect of behaviour on the viability space can be mapped and quantified. This lets us move closer to defining adaptive action more precisely as that course of behaviour whose effect is in accordance with an intrinsic normative field.

[1]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[2]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Chemo-ethology of an Adaptive Protocell - Sensorless Sensitivity to Implicit Viability Conditions , 2009, ECAL.

[3]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  The Process Dynamics of Normative Function , 2002 .

[4]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[5]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Behavioral Metabolution: The Adaptive and Evolutionary Potential of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2011, Artificial Life.

[6]  Jean-Pierre Aubin,et al.  Viability Theory: New Directions , 2011 .

[7]  Christopher Alexander THE PHENOMENON OF LIFE , 2020, The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life.

[8]  R. Millikan In Defense of Proper Functions , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  Tyler Burge,et al.  Primitive Agency and Natural Norms , 2009 .

[10]  A. Chemero,et al.  Dynamics , Agency and Intentional Action , 2011 .

[11]  Federico Morán,et al.  A Simple Self-Maintaining Metabolic System: Robustness, Autocatalysis, Bistability , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Fabio Mavelli,et al.  On the way towards 'basic autonomous agents': Stochastic simulations of minimal lipid-peptide cells , 2008, Biosyst..

[13]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo Unbinding Biological Autonomy: Francisco Varela's Contributions to Artificial Life , 2004, Artificial Life.

[14]  Douglas Lavin,et al.  On the Problem of Action , 2012 .

[15]  S. Kauffman,et al.  On emergence, agency, and organization , 2006 .

[16]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: The problem of action , 1988 .

[17]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry, and Spatio-temporality in Action , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[18]  W. Ashby,et al.  Design for a brain; the origin of adaptive behavior , 2011 .

[19]  Stuart Kauffman,et al.  Molecular autonomous agents , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  A Minimal Model of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  David McFarland,et al.  Animal Behaviour Psychobiology, Ethology, and Evolution , 1985 .

[22]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency , 2005 .

[23]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[24]  Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  Basic Autonomy as a Fundamental Step in the Synthesis of Life , 2004, Artificial Life.

[25]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Behavioral Metabolution - Metabolism Based Behavior Enables New Forms of Adaptation and Evolution , 2010, ALIFE.

[26]  J. Skewes,et al.  Bio-agency and the problem of action , 2009 .

[27]  S. Kauffman Autocatalytic sets of proteins. , 1986 .

[28]  H. Jonas,et al.  Biological Foundations of Individuality , 1968 .