Computer-Assisted Fracture Reduction: Novel Method for Analysis of Accuracy

Anatomic reduction of displaced fractures is limited by the chosen surgical approach and intraoperative visualization. Preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) enhances the analysis of the fracture pattern and provides accurate spatial relationships. Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) was introduced to increase the accuracy of specific surgical procedures. CAS systems can be used for implant placement or osteotomies in intact bone or reduced situations prior to obtaining the CT data, as differentiation into different datasets related to specific fragments is not yet possible. We present a model that allows “virtual” controlled reduction, providing computer assistance during the fracture reduction. Prior to clinical application, the accuracy of the process of virtual reduction must be proven in an experimental setting. An in vitro fracture model with two body fragments and a motion tracking system for three-dimensional (3D) control (accuracy 0.1 mm and 0.1°) was used. Two methods were employed: direct visualization and reduction by the examiner, and “virtual” reduction, performed solely with the use of a computer image, in which the examiner lacks any direct visualization of the fragments. The results of this very simplified “fracture” model indicate that the overall difference between direct and virtual controlled reduction was very small. A significant difference of 0.3 mm (0-1.8 mm) was seen for the residual displacement represented by the Euclidean distance (p < 0.01), whereas the difference in the residual angulation was not significant (p > 0.05). The methods tested revealed that virtual controlled reduction is nearly as accurate as direct visualization. Reduction control utilizing a motion tracker system reveals accurate 3D information in this simplified reduction setup, and is now used as a standard setup for analyzing realistic fracture models.

[1]  H Labelle,et al.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. , 2000, Spine.

[2]  B. McGrory,et al.  Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum , 2003 .

[3]  H. Matsuzaki,et al.  Problems and Solutions of Pedicle Screw Plate Fixation of Lumbar Spine , 1990, Spine.

[4]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[5]  E Schneider,et al.  Fixation of Transforaminal Sacrum Fractures: A Biomechanical Study , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  F Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[7]  S. Gumina,et al.  Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  P. Papagelopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  F Langlotz,et al.  The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[10]  A. Jacob,et al.  A whole-body registration-free navigation system for image-guided surgery and interventional radiology. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[11]  P Merloz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  T. Laine,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Fabrice Chassat,et al.  Experimental Protocol for Accuracy Evaluation of 6-d Localizers for Computer-Integrated Surgery: Application to Four Optical Localizers , 1998, MICCAI.

[14]  R N Brueton,et al.  The role of 3D CT in the assessment of acetabular fractures. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  R. Schmitt,et al.  Computertomographische diagnostik bei Azetabulumfrakturen , 1987 .

[16]  F Langlotz,et al.  Computer Assistance for Pelvic Osteotomies , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[18]  T. Hüfner,et al.  Dreidimensionale Bewegungsanalyse nach interner Stabilisierung von Beckenringfrakturen Eine Computersimulation , 2000, Der Unfallchirurg.