Decentralized power system stabilizer design using linear parameter varying approach

In this paper, the power system model is formulated as a finite dimensional linear system whose state-space entries depend continuously on a time varying parameter vector called the scheduling variables. This system is referred to as the linear parameter varying (LPV) system. Although the trajectory of the changing parameters such as load levels and tie line flows is not known in advance, in most situations, they can be measured in real time. The LPV technique is applied to the decentralized design of power system stabilizers (PSS) for large systems. In the approach developed, instead of considering the complete system model with all the interconnections, we develop a decentralized approach where each individual machine is considered separately with arbitrarily changing real and reactive power output in a defined range. These variables are chosen as the scheduling variables. The designed controller automatically adjusts its parameters depending on the scheduling variables to coordinate with change of operating conditions and the dynamics of the rest of the system. The resulting decentralized PSSs give good performance in a large operating range. Design procedures are presented and comparisons are made between the LPV decentralized PSSs and conventionally designed PSSs on the 50-generator IEEE test system.

[1]  Graham Rogers,et al.  Power System Oscillations , 1999 .

[2]  K. Ohtsuka,et al.  A decentralized control system for stabilizing a longitudinal power system using tieline power flow measurements , 1997 .

[3]  Fen Wu Switching LPV control design for magnetic bearing systems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA'01) (Cat. No.01CH37204).

[4]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Application of the structured singular value theory for robust stability and control analysis in multimachine power systems. I. Framework development , 1998 .

[5]  A. Packard,et al.  Robust performance of linear parametrically varying systems using parametrically-dependent linear feedback , 1994 .

[6]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  On the design of LPV controllers for the F-14 aircraft lateral-directional axis during powered approach , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[7]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of HVDC controls for robust stability of power systems , 1995 .

[8]  T. T. Lie,et al.  A hybrid neuro-fuzzy power system stabilizer , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[9]  Zhe Lin,et al.  Robust gain-scheduled aircraft longitudinal controller design using an /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// approach , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[10]  A. Petroianu,et al.  Design of suboptimal H/sup /spl infin// excitation controllers , 1995 .

[11]  G. J. Rogers,et al.  H∞ damping controller design in large power systems. Discussion. Author's reply , 1995 .

[12]  O. P. Malik,et al.  H∞ optimisation-based power system stabiliser design , 1995 .

[13]  M. A. Pai,et al.  Parametric robust stability of power systems using generalized Kharitonov's theorem , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Saeed Tavakoli,et al.  A systematic approach to performance weights selection in design of robust H/sup /spl infin// PSS using genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[15]  J. Reeve,et al.  Gain scheduling adaptive control strategies for HVDC systems to accommodate large disturbances , 1994 .

[16]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Transient Stability Test Systems for Direct Stability Methods , 1992 .

[17]  E. Larsen,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-100, No. 6 June 1981 APPLYING POWER SYSTEM STABILIZERS PART I: GENERAL CONCEPTS , 2006 .

[18]  Arturo Roman Messina,et al.  Recent applications of linear analysis techniques , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[19]  F. Ghosh Design and Performance of a Local Gain Scheduling Power System Stabilizer for Inter-Connected System , 1991, TENCON '91. Region 10 International Conference on EC3-Energy, Computer, Communication and Control Systems.

[20]  Udaya Annakkage,et al.  An optimum gain scheduling power system stabilizer , 1991 .

[21]  Michael Athans,et al.  Guaranteed properties of gain scheduled control for linear parameter-varying plants , 1991, Autom..

[22]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  LPV control design for pitch-axis missile autopilots , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[23]  D. Siljak,et al.  Robust Decentralized Turbine/Governor Control Using Linear Matrix Inequalities , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[24]  P. Kundur,et al.  Application of Power System Stabilizers for Enhancement of Overall System Stability , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[25]  Fen Wu,et al.  Induced L2‐norm control for LPV systems with bounded parameter variation rates , 1996 .

[26]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Analysis of control performance for stability robustness of power systems , 1994 .

[27]  G. J. Rogers,et al.  Extended transient-midterm stability program package: Version 2. 0 , 1989 .