Safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with positive biomarkers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy trial.

OBJECTIVES There are limited data on bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) with positive biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (troponin and/or creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with positive biomarkers from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS We compared the net adverse clinical events [composite ischemia - (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned ischemic revascularization) - or noncoronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)-related major bleeding] among patients with biomarker-positive NSTE-ACS in the ACUITY trial overall and by antithrombotic strategy. RESULTS Among 13 819 patients with NSTE-ACS enrolled in ACUITY, 4728 patients presented with positive biomarkers and underwent an early invasive strategy. Of those, 1547 were randomized to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), 1555 to bivalirudin plus GPI, and 1626 to bivalirudin monotherapy. Compared with biomarker-negative patients, biomarker-positive patients had higher 30-day rates of net adverse clinical events (14.0 vs. 12.4%; P = 0.04), all-cause death (1.3 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.001), cardiac death (1.1 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.005), and non-CABG-related major bleeding (6.5 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.03). At 30 days, bivalirudin monotherapy was associated with significantly less non-CABG-related major bleeding (bivalirudin monotherapy 4.1% vs. bivalirudin plus GPI 8.4% vs. heparin plus GPI 7.1%) with comparable rates of composite ischemia (bivalirudin monotherapy 9.2% vs. bivalirudin plus GPI 9.9% vs. heparin plus GPI 8.4%). In a multivariable model, bivalirudin monotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in non-CABG-related major bleeding but was not associated with an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION Compared with heparin plus GPI or bivalirudin plus GPI, bivalirudin monotherapy provides similar protection from ischemic events with less major bleeding at 30 days among patients with NSTE-ACS and positive biomarkers.

[1]  P. Jüni,et al.  Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation , 2017, European heart journal.

[2]  S. Windecker,et al.  Bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed invasively with and without ST elevation (MATRIX): randomised controlled trial , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[3]  P. Jüni,et al.  Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Stone,et al.  Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary PCI. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Abciximab and heparin versus bivalirudin for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Adelaide,et al.  Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  K. Eagle,et al.  Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE) , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[11]  A. Defranco,et al.  Prognostic Implication of Anemia on In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004, Circulation.

[12]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[13]  A. Go,et al.  The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. White,et al.  Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  F. Harrell,et al.  Cardiac Troponin T Levels for Risk Stratification in Acute Myocardial Ischemia , 1996 .