Comparison of severity scoring systems A‐DROP and CURB‐65 for community‐acquired pneumonia

Background and objective:  The initial assessment of the severity of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) is important for patient management. The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has proposed a 6‐point scale (0–5) to assess the clinical severity of CAP. The A‐DROP scoring system assesses the following parameters: (i) Age (male ≥ 70 years, female ≥ 75 years); (ii) Dehydration (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) ≥ 210 mg/L); (iii) Respiratory failure (SaO2 ≤ 90% or PaO2 ≤ 60 mm Hg); (iv) Orientation disturbance (confusion); and (v) low blood Pressure (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg). A‐DROP is a modified version of CURB‐65 (confusion, BUN > 7 mmol/L (200 mg/L), respiratory rate ≥ 30/min, low blood pressure (diastolic ≤ 60 mm Hg or systolic < 90 mm Hg, and age ≥ 65 years) proposed by the British Thoracic Society. However, validation of A‐DROP has not been attempted nor has it been compared with CURB‐65. The aim of this study was to confirm that A‐DROP is equivalent to CURB‐65 for predicting severity of CAP.

[1]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study , 2003, Thorax.

[2]  M. Fine,et al.  A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  古谷 良輔,et al.  Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  N. Miyashita,et al.  The JRS guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: an update and new recommendations. , 2006, Internal medicine.

[5]  J. Sung,et al.  Prospective comparison of three predictive rules for assessing severity of community-acquired pneumonia in Hong Kong , 2007, Thorax.

[6]  M. Niederman,et al.  Validation of predictive rules and indices of severity for community acquired pneumonia , 2004, Thorax.

[7]  Donald M Yealy,et al.  Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  K. Kubo,et al.  [Results of survey of adult community-acquired pneumonia utilizing flow chart of diagnostic guideline for management of respiratory infections]. , 2003, Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society.

[9]  笠原 敬,et al.  The Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults , 2008 .

[10]  A. Bilbao,et al.  Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia , 2006, European Respiratory Journal.

[11]  G. Town,et al.  Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission. , 1996, Thorax.

[12]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.