Optimal Ventilatory Strategies and Surfactant to Protect the Preterm Lungs

Invasive ventilation via the endotracheal tube is one of the most common therapeutic interventions performed in preterm infants with respiratory failure. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) occurs in about 50% of preterm infants born at less than 30 weeks of gestational age. Mechanical ventilation using conventional or high-frequency ventilation and surfactant therapy have become the standard of care in management of preterm infants with RDS. However, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains as a major morbidity with adverse pulmonary and nonpulmonary outcomes in preterm infants despite these interventions. Ventilator-associated lung injury appears to be related to the duration of invasive ventilation via the endotracheal tube rather than the mode of ventilation. Randomized controlled trials comparing conventional mechanical ventilation and high-frequency ventilation, using ‘optimal ventilatory strategies’, have shown no significant difference in rates of BPD. Use of noninvasive ventilation, such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation has shown a significant decrease in postextubation failure as well as reduced incidence of BPD. Optimal ventilatory strategy in preterm infants with RDS may begin in the delivery room with application of sustained inflation to establish functional residual capacity, followed by surfactant therapy and rapid extubation to noninvasive ventilation to decrease the incidence of BPD and improve overall outcome.

[1]  S. Laroche,et al.  Early use of high frequency ventilation in the premature neonate , 2003, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[2]  R. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Infasurf (Calfactant) and Survanta (Beractant) in the Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2005, Pediatrics.

[3]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Randomised clinical trial of two treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. , 1995, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[4]  R. Habib,et al.  Changes in lung volume and work of breathing: A comparison of two variable‐flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very low birth weight infants , 2003, Pediatric pulmonology.

[5]  D. S. Brudno,et al.  Multicenter controlled clinical trial of high-frequency jet ventilation in preterm infants with uncomplicated respiratory distress syndrome. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[6]  W. Carlo,et al.  Early randomized intervention with high-frequency jet ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome. , 1990, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  F. Walther,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Delivery-Room Respiratory Management in Very Preterm Infants , 2007, Pediatrics.

[8]  G. Lipowsky,et al.  Randomized comparison of high-frequency ventilation with high-rate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure. , 1999, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  L. Mildenhall,et al.  Outcomes for infants weighing less than 1000 grams cared for with a nasal continuous positive airway pressure‐based strategy , 2004, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[10]  A. Kribs Is It Safer to Intubate Premature Infants in the Delivery Room? , 2006, Pediatrics.

[11]  R. Ehrenkranz,et al.  Effect of introduction of synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in a neonatal intensive care unit on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and growth in preterm infants. , 2006, American journal of perinatology.

[12]  S. Wang,et al.  Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity , 1998, Pediatric pulmonology.

[13]  V. Bhandari,et al.  A Prospective Observational Pilot Study of Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (SNIPPV) as a Primary Mode of Ventilation in Infants ≥ 28 Weeks with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) , 2004, Journal of Perinatology.

[14]  N. Marlow,et al.  High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Polin,et al.  Is the New Definition of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia More Useful? , 2005, Journal of Perinatology.

[16]  W. Carlo,et al.  Comparison of Infasurf (calf lung surfactant extract) to Survanta (Beractant) in the treatment and prevention of respiratory distress syndrome. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[17]  P. Kopecký,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  J. Muraskas,et al.  A randomized trial comparing beractant and poractant treatment in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. , 2005, Acta paediatrica.

[19]  Martin Keszler,et al.  Interaction between Surfactant and Ventilatory Support in Newborns with Primary Surfactant Deficiency , 2003, Neonatology.

[20]  K. Barrington,et al.  Randomized Trial of Nasal Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Compared With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants , 2001, Pediatrics.

[21]  J. Aschner,et al.  High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. HiFO Study Group. , 1993, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  L. Graziani,et al.  High-frequency jet ventilation in the early management of respiratory distress syndrome is associated with a greater risk for adverse outcomes. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[24]  B. Roth,et al.  A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant. , 1998, The Journal of pediatrics.

[25]  C. O. Kamlin,et al.  Predicting successful extubation of very low birthweight infants , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[26]  J. Aschner,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[27]  Treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Clark,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory and conventional ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome. , 1992, Pediatrics.

[29]  T. Shaffer,et al.  Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. , 1993, Pediatrics.

[30]  C. Uiterwaal,et al.  Cumulative metaanalysis of high-frequency versus conventional ventilation in premature neonates. , 2003, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[31]  U. Simeoni,et al.  The CURPAP Study: An International Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Combining Prophylactic Surfactant and Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Preterm Infants , 2008, Neonatology.

[32]  M. Keszler,et al.  Multicenter controlled trial comparing high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema. , 1991, The Journal of pediatrics.

[33]  G. Dimitriou,et al.  Synchronized mechanical ventilation in neonates , 2001 .

[34]  N. Finer,et al.  Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation. , 2001, Resuscitation.

[35]  M. Roizen High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. The HIFI Study Group. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  N. Finer,et al.  A randomized, multicenter masked comparison trial of poractant alfa (Curosurf) versus beractant (Survanta) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. , 2004, American journal of perinatology.

[37]  R. Clark,et al.  The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[38]  N. Finer,et al.  The Sy-Fi Study: A Randomized Prospective Trial of Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus a High-Frequency Flow Interrupter in Infants Less Than 1000 G , 2003, Journal of Perinatology.

[39]  F. Mosca,et al.  Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28–31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial , 2004, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[40]  P. Davis,et al.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003? , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[41]  L. Storme,et al.  With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilation and Conventional Ventilation in Preterm Infants of Less Than 30 Prospective Randomized Multicenter Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory , 2001 .

[42]  H. Togari,et al.  A multicenter randomized trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure. , 1993, Early human development.

[43]  H. Hummler,et al.  Delivery Room Management of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: Spontaneous Breathing or Intubation? , 1999, Pediatrics.

[44]  M. Walsh,et al.  Impact of a Physiologic Definition on Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Rates , 2004, Pediatrics.

[45]  P. Davis,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs , 2001, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[46]  P. Friedlich,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Nasopharyngeal-Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus Nasopharyngeal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants After Extubation , 1999, Journal of Perinatology.

[47]  J. Baumer,et al.  International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome , 2000, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[48]  A. Riskin,et al.  Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. , 2007, The Journal of pediatrics.