Regional climate models downscaling analysis of general circulation models present climate biases propagation into future change projections

A suite of eighteen simulations over the U.S. and Mexico, representing combinations of two mesoscale regional climate models (RCMs), two driving global general circulation models (GCMs), and the historical and four future anthropogenic forcings were intercompared. The RCMs' downscaling reduces significantly driving GCMs' present‐climate biases and narrows inter‐model differences in representing climate sensitivity and hence in simulating the present and future climates. Very high spatial pattern correlations of the RCM minus GCM differences in precipitation and surface temperature between the present and future climates indicate that major model present‐climate biases are systematically propagated into future‐climate projections at regional scales. The total impacts of the biases on trend projections also depend strongly on regions and cannot be linearly removed. The result suggests that the nested RCM‐GCM approach that offers skill enhancement in representing the present climate also likely provides higher credibility in downscaling the future climate projection.

[1]  G. Grell,et al.  Regional Climate Model Simulation of U.S.–Mexico Summer Precipitation Using the Optimal Ensemble of Two Cumulus Parameterizations , 2007 .

[2]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[3]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[4]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[5]  G. Meehl,et al.  Constraining Climate Sensitivity from the Seasonal Cycle in Surface Temperature , 2006 .

[6]  Jianping Pan,et al.  Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change , 2006 .

[7]  J. Shukla,et al.  Climate model fidelity and projections of climate change , 2006 .

[8]  R. Arritt,et al.  Simulations of Present and Future Climates in the Western United States with Four Nested Regional Climate Models , 2006 .

[9]  A. Hall,et al.  Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change , 2006 .

[10]  David P. Rowell,et al.  A scenario of European climate change for the late twenty-first century: seasonal means and interannual variability , 2005 .

[11]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Regional climate model simulation of summer precipitation diurnal cycle over the United States , 2004 .

[12]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Regional Climate Model Simulation of U.S. Precipitation during 1982–2002. Part I: Annual Cycle , 2004 .

[13]  P. Duffy,et al.  Present and future surface climate in the western USA as simulated by 15 global climate models , 2004 .

[14]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[15]  J. Roads,et al.  U.S. Climate Sensitivity Simulated with the NCEP Regional Spectral Model , 2004 .

[16]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Probability of regional climate change based on the Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) method , 2003 .

[17]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios , 2003 .

[18]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Development of a Regional Climate Model for U.S. Midwest Applications. Part I: Sensitivity to Buffer Zone Treatment , 2001 .

[19]  J. Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations , 2001 .

[20]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations , 2000 .

[21]  S. Ghan,et al.  Pacific Northwest Climate Sensitivity Simulated by a Regional Climate Model Driven by a GCM. Part I: Control Simulations , 1999 .

[22]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 × CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S. , 1998 .

[23]  G. Grell Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations , 1993 .

[24]  John S. Kain,et al.  Convective parameterization for mesoscale models : The Kain-Fritsch Scheme , 1993 .

[25]  K. Emanuel,et al.  The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models , 1993 .